<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NewsTrust - Media Channel - Most Recent Stories</title>
    <copyright>Copyright (c) 2008 NewsTrust</copyright>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 21:34:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>http://newstrust.net/topics/mediachannel/top_stories</link>
    <description>NewsTrust helps people find good journalism online. We rate the news based on quality, not just popularity. Our social news network features top-rated stories from hundreds of mainstream and independent sources. Find out more at http://newstrust.net/</description>
    <item>
      <title>Romney's Making the Right Play in Iowa</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8426054?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8426054?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/new_york_times?ref=rss&quot;&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt; - By By NATE SILVER - Nov. 22 (Opinion) - Jeff Zeleny&#8217;s weekend story about how Mitt Romney&#8217;s campaign will exert more rather than less effort in Iowa deserves your attention. It reflects what is perhaps the most important strategic decision that any Republican candidate will make this year. Mr.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8426054?ref=rss&quot;&gt;2.0 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8426054?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Review&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8426054?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Pakistan</category>
      <category>DVD</category>
      <category>Online</category>
      <category>Buddhism</category>
      <category>Media Channel</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The final nail in coffin for Net neutrality</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/3944082/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/3944082/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/business_2?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Business 2.0&lt;/a&gt; - By David Goldman - Nov. 03 (News Analysis) - Before Tuesday's midterm elections, there were 95 House and Senate candidates who pledged support for Net neutrality, a bill that would force Internet providers to not charge users more for certain kinds of Web content.

All of them lost -- and that could mean the contentious proposal may now be all but dead.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/3944082?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.6 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/3944082?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/3944082/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Law</category>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Midterm Elections</category>
      <category>Internet</category>
      <category>Technology</category>
      <category>Telecommunications</category>
      <category>Media Ownership</category>
      <category>Media Channel</category>
      <category>FCC</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Chasing Fox</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/3546255/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/3546255/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/new_york_magazine?ref=rss&quot;&gt;New York Magazine&lt;/a&gt; - By Gabriel Sherman - Oct. 03 (News Analysis) - In the spring of 2006, a year and a half after he was hired to run CNN/U.S., Jonathan Klein went to his boss Jim Walton with an idea. CNN was in trouble. While the network remained a profit engine and an iconic brand, prime-time ratings were stalled. Fox News had surged ahead in the cable-news race, and now, alarmingly, Keith Olbermann was coming on strong. His anti-Bush broadsides were transforming his 8 p.m. MSNBC show, Countdown, into a bombastic counterweight to Fox&#8217;s Bill O&#8217;Reilly, and combined, both personalities were drowning out CNN&#8217;s Paula Zahn, the respected television veteran who was anchoring a standard newscast during the 8 p.m. slot.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/3546255?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.7 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/3546255?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/3546255/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Money and Politics</category>
      <category>Money</category>
      <category>Ethics in Journalism</category>
      <category>Journalism</category>
      <category>Mainstream Media</category>
      <category>Media Ownership</category>
      <category>New Media</category>
      <category>TV</category>
      <category>Media Channel</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Disaster Messaging</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/2413647/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/2413647/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/truthout?ref=rss&quot;&gt;TruthOut&lt;/a&gt; - By George Lakoff - Jul. 08 (Opinion) - Democrats are constantly resorting to disaster messaging. Here's a description of the typical situation:

        * The Republicans out-message the Democrats. The Democrats, having no effective response, face disaster: They lose politically, either in electoral support or failure on crucial legislation.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/2413647?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.4 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/2413647?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/2413647/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Democrats</category>
      <category>Republicans</category>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Psychology</category>
      <category>Media Ownership</category>
      <category>Media Channel</category>
      <category>Bad Journalism</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Billionaire funds web news rival to San Francisco Chronicle paper</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/1882813/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/1882813/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/the_independent?ref=rss&quot;&gt;The Independent&lt;/a&gt; - By Stephen Foley - May. 26 (News Report) - One of America's oldest and largest newspapers, the San Francisco Chroncile, faces a new online-only rival from today, with the launch of Baycitizen.org &#8211; a not-for-profit website that is part of a growing trend reshaping US journalism.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/1882813?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.4 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/1882813?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Review&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/1882813/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Media Ownership</category>
      <category>New Media</category>
      <category>Media Channel</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
