<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>NewsTrust - Advertising - Most Recent Stories</title>
    <copyright>Copyright (c) 2008 NewsTrust</copyright>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 07:32:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
    
    <link>http://newstrust.net/topics/advertising/top_stories</link>
    <description>NewsTrust helps people find good journalism online. We rate the news based on quality, not just popularity. Our social news network features top-rated stories from hundreds of mainstream and independent sources. Find out more at http://newstrust.net/</description>
    <item>
      <title>Ignore the news</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/9207980/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/9207980/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;antipope.org - Apr. 16 (Opinion) - I've been doing less and less news recently, partly because its depressing, and partly because its all Thatcher, and mostly because I haven't yet found an adequate replacement for Google Reader. Feedly looks like it will be decent. I love how I post a bl&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/9207980?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.8 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/9207980?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/9207980/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Mainstream Media</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Industry Outlook Panel Yields Words to Thrive By</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/9121222/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/9121222/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;siia.net - By Ronn Levine - Feb. 06 (Review) - &#8220;How far can companies go before they annoy their users?&#8221; asked Esther Dyson, chairman of EDventure Holdings, at last week&#8217;s Breakthrough: IIS 2013 Conference in New York. With Facebook&#8217;s new Search Graph, Google&#8217;s deeper searches and other initiatives based on user data, will the time come where people say the loss of privacy is not worth the enhanced information they can get?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/9121222?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.1 average&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/9121222?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/9121222/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Internet</category>
      <category>New Media</category>
      <category>Privacy</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Political ads bombard viewers, but to what effect?</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8963701?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8963701?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/associated_press?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Associated Press&lt;/a&gt; - By Beth Fouhy - Oct. 15 (News Analysis) - Is there any escape from all those political ads in the most hotly contested states in the three weeks before the presidential election? ...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8963701?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.8 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8963701?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Review&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8963701?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Mitt Romney</category>
      <category>Presidential Election 2012</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facing up to the high cost of free news</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8952741/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8952741/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/columbia_journalism_review?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Columbia Journalism Review&lt;/a&gt; - By Dean Starkman - Oct. 08 (Special Report) - Pretty soon, proponents of free digital news will have to own up to the implications of their model. The structure is flawed. To rely on online ads as the sole source of revenue is both unsound in theory, and in practice it's having disastrous consequences in regional newsrooms, mostly notable at the Times-Picayune and other Advance Publications papers...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8952741?ref=rss&quot;&gt;2.9 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8952741?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Review&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8952741/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Journalism</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PAC's newspaper ad filled with falsehoods</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8935204/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8935204/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/politifact?ref=rss&quot;&gt;PolitiFact&lt;/a&gt; - By Becky Bowers, Jon Greenberg, Angie Drobnic Holan, Louis Jacobson, Molly Moorhead, Katie Sanders - Sep. 27 (Fact Check) - A full-page newspaper ad running in swing states purports to reveal &quot;the true agenda of Barack Hussein Obama.&quot; It says he will: &quot;Force Christian organizations to pay for abortions.&quot; &quot;Force employers to give illegal immigrants the jobs of U.S. citizens.&quot; and more. 
It&#8217;s from a political action committee that operates under the name &quot;Government is Not God,&quot; or GING-PAC for short.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8935204?ref=rss&quot;&gt;4.5 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8935204?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Review&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8935204/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Money and Politics</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Presidential Election 2012</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>After Facebook fails</title>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8731623/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8731623/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;Harvard Blogs - By Doc Searls - May. 24 (Opinion) - At the heart of the Internet business is one of the great business fallacies of our time: that the Web, with all its targeting abilities, can be a more efficient, and hence more profitable, advertising medium than traditional media. Facebook, with its 90&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8731623?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.9 average&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8731623?ref=rss&quot;&gt;4&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8731623/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Finance</category>
      <category>Internet</category>
      <category>Psychology</category>
      <category>Social Networks</category>
      <category>Facebook</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Money Unlimited</title>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8714038?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8714038?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/new_yorker?ref=rss&quot;&gt;New Yorker&lt;/a&gt; - By Jeffrey Toobin - May. 21 (Special Report) - When Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission was first argued before the Supreme Court, on March 24, 2009, it seemed like a case of modest importance. The issue before the Justices was a narrow one. The McCain-Feingold campaign-finance law prohibi&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8714038?ref=rss&quot;&gt;4.0 average&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8714038?ref=rss&quot;&gt;18&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8714038?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Law</category>
      <category>U.S. Congress</category>
      <category>U.S. Supreme Court</category>
      <category>Republicans</category>
      <category>Campaign Reform</category>
      <category>Election Reform</category>
      <category>Money and Politics</category>
      <category>Elections</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Corporate Governance</category>
      <category>Campaign Finance</category>
      <category>Presidential Election 2012</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The PolitiFact guide to Medicare attack lines</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8701037/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8701037/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/politifact?ref=rss&quot;&gt;PolitiFact&lt;/a&gt; - By Angie Drobnic Holan, Louis Jacobson - May. 06 (Fact Check) - Barack Obama has slashed Medicare by $500 billion. Mitt Romney and House Republicans want to end Medicare. And a new board is going to ration care so Washington can waste more money. Believe any of that? You shouldn&#8217;t. But it&#8217;s what the political ads likely will be saying between now and Election Day in November. We have some advice for voters sorting out the claims: Believe nothing you hear in a 30-second TV ad. 

Here are a few facts about Medicare: 
&#8226; It&#8217;s the government-run health insurance for Americans over age 65. 
&#8226; It&#8217;s a Canada-style, single-payer system. Liberals love that; conservatives don&#8217;t.

&#8226; It has approximately 50 million people on its rolls.

&#8226; That 50 million will grow to 80 million as baby boomers retire. Paying for that will be a challenge.

Those realities about Medicare have sparked a full-fledged political brawl for 2012.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8701037?ref=rss&quot;&gt;2.0 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8701037?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8701037/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>U.S. Congress</category>
      <category>Democrats</category>
      <category>Republicans</category>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Obama Administration</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Health Care</category>
      <category>Medicare</category>
      <category>Social Security</category>
      <category>Presidential Election 2012</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Hotel's Free Wi-Fi Comes With Hidden Extras</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8653058?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8653058?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/new_york_times?ref=rss&quot;&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt; - By Brian X. Chen - Apr. 07 (News Report) - A Web engineer notices an odd glitch while using the wireless access at a Courtyard Marriott in New York -- and discovers that the hotel's Internet service is injecting advertising code into every Web page he visits. A site selling the technology for this system refers to it as &quot;Web experience manipulation.&quot;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8653058?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.9 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8653058?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8653058?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Civil Liberties</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Internet</category>
      <category>Technology</category>
      <category>Privacy</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The State of the News Media 2012</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8630844/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8630844/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/pew_research?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Pew Research&lt;/a&gt; - By Amy Mitchell, Tom Rosenstiel - Mar. 25 (Special Report) - In 2011, the digital revolution entered a new era.

The age of mobile, in which people are connected to the web wherever they are, arrived in earnest. More than four in ten American adults now own a smartphone. One in five owns a tablet. New cars are manufactured with internet built in. With more mobility comes deeper immersion into social networking.

For news, the new era brings mixed blessings.

New research released in this report finds that mobile devices are adding to people&#8217;s news consumption, strengthening the lure of traditional news brands and providing a boost to long-form journalism. Eight in ten who get news on smartphones or tablets, for instance, get news on conventional computers as well. People are taking advantage, in other words, of having easier access to news throughout the day &#8211; in their pocket, on their desks and in their laps.

At the same time, a more fundamental challenge that we identified in this report last year has intensified &#8212; the extent to which technology intermediaries now control the future of news.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8630844?ref=rss&quot;&gt;4.6 average&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8630844?ref=rss&quot;&gt;7&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8630844/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Internet</category>
      <category>Technology</category>
      <category>Google</category>
      <category>Computers</category>
      <category>Psychology</category>
      <category>Ethics in Journalism</category>
      <category>Journalism</category>
      <category>Mainstream Media</category>
      <category>New Media</category>
      <category>Social Networks</category>
      <category>Government</category>
      <category>Facebook</category>
      <category>Mobile</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rick Santorum's Dystopia of the Year 2014</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8630839/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8630839/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;Paleofuture - By Matt Novak - Mar. 25 (Opinion) - According to Rick Santorum, if Obama is re-elected Americans will be forced to fill up their heads with gasoline

Probably inspired by Hunger Games mania, Rick Santorum recently released the most dystopian campaign video we've seen in quite a while. Called &quot;Obamaville,&quot; the video depicts the bleak world of 2014: President Obama has been re-elected, the playgrounds sit empty, freedom of religion is under attack, and apparently we're all cyborgs powered by putting gasoliine directly into our heads. THANKS A LOT OBAMA!

As a fan of apocalyptic fiction, I watched closely and noticed a few interesting images that the campaign chose to include in the video. Some of the weirder images are below. If you notice the same timecode for some images it's because these images were only up for 2 or 3 frames, and trust me, that's where the gold is!&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8630839?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.7 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8630839?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8630839/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Obama Administration</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Fake News</category>
      <category>Rick Santorum</category>
      <category>Presidential Election 2012</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Santorum-boosting PAC Slams Romney, Obama</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8616670/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8616670/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/factcheck?ref=rss&quot;&gt;FactCheck&lt;/a&gt; - By Robert Farley - Mar. 17 (Fact Check) - Two new TV ads from a pro-Rick Santorum super PAC attack Mitt Romney and President Obama on Republican hot button issues: debt, taxes and oil. But the ads mislead on several fronts.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8616670?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.9 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8616670?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Review&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8616670/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Money and Politics</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Energy</category>
      <category>Oil and Gas</category>
      <category>Mitt Romney</category>
      <category>Rick Santorum</category>
      <category>Presidential Election 2012</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rush Limbaugh Scandal Proves Contagious for Talk-Radio Advertisers</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8606049/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8606049/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/daily_beast?ref=rss&quot;&gt;The Daily Beast&lt;/a&gt; - By John Avlon - Mar. 10 (News Analysis) - Premiere Networks, which distributes Limbaugh as well as a host of other right-wing talkers, sent an email out to its affiliates early Friday listing 98 large corporations that have requested their ads appear only on &#8220;programs free of content that you know are deemed to be offensive or controversial (for example, Mark Levin, Rush Limbaugh, Tom Leykis, Michael Savage, Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity).&#8221;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8606049?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.5 average&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8606049?ref=rss&quot;&gt;7&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8606049/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Republicans</category>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Women</category>
      <category>Ethics in Journalism</category>
      <category>Fake News</category>
      <category>Mainstream Media</category>
      <category>Abortion</category>
      <category>Presidential Election 2012</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Karl Rove &#8216;offended&#8217; by Clint Eastwood&#8217;s Chrysler ad</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8552431/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8552431/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/washington_post?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt; - By Rachel Weiner - Feb. 07 (News Report) - A Chrysler ad aired during the Super Bowl Sunday night has inspired ire among some Republicans and admiration among some Democrats &#8212; with both sides seeing a political message that boosts President Obama.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8552431?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.5 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8552431?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8552431/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>U.S. Economy</category>
      <category>Democrats</category>
      <category>Republicans</category>
      <category>Obama Administration</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Transportation</category>
      <category>Cars</category>
      <category>Presidential Election 2012</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Newspapers, Paywalls, and Core Users</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8497078/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8497078/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;shirky.com - By Clay Shirky - Jan. 04 (Opinion) - This may be the year where newspapers finally drop the idea of treating all news as a product, and all readers as customers.

One early sign of this shift was the 2010 launch of paywalls for the London Times and Sunday Times. These involved no new strategy; however, the newspaper world was finally willing to regard them as real test of whether general-interest papers could induce a critical mass of readers to pay. (Nope.) Then, in March, the New York Times introduced a charge for readers who crossed a certain threshold of article views (a pattern copied from the financial press, and especially the Financial Times.) Finally, and most recently, were a pair of announcements last month: The Chicago Sun-Times was adopting a new threshold charge, and the Minneapolis Star-Tribune said that their existing one was working well. Taken together, these events are a blow to the idea that online news can be treated as a simple product for sale, as the physical newspaper was.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8497078?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.9 average&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8497078?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8497078/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Finance</category>
      <category>Journalism</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When candidates lie, what's a political reporter to do?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8441087/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8441087/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/nieman_watchdog?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Nieman Journalism Lab&lt;/a&gt; - By Dan Froomkin - Nov. 30 (Opinion) - How journalists respond to intentional deception will be a defining feature of 2012 political coverage. Will they allow themselves to become accessories to deceptive politicians? Or will they aggressively and repeatedly expose misinformation and the people who traffic in it?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8441087?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.8 average&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8441087?ref=rss&quot;&gt;9&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8441087/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Ethics in Journalism</category>
      <category>Fake News</category>
      <category>Journalism</category>
      <category>Mitt Romney</category>
      <category>Presidential Election 2012</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Romney&#8217;s Ad &#8216;Deceitful &amp; Dishonest&#8217;?</title>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/8427388/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/8427388/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/factcheck?ref=rss&quot;&gt;FactCheck&lt;/a&gt; - By Brooks Jackson - Nov. 23 (Fact Check) - The Obama campaign is in a lather over Mitt Romney&#8217;s first TV spot, calling it &#8220;a deceitful and dishonest attack&#8221; because of an edited quote from 2008. That&#8217;s a matter of opinion. We find a far more consequential issue is the ad&#8217;s exaggerated claim that the new health care law &#8230; More &gt;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8427388?ref=rss&quot;&gt;4.0 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8427388?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Review&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/8427388/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>U.S. Economy</category>
      <category>Republicans</category>
      <category>Obama Administration</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Ethics in Journalism</category>
      <category>Fake News</category>
      <category>Journalism</category>
      <category>Mitt Romney</category>
      <category>Jobs</category>
      <category>Presidential Election 2012</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attack of the Attack Ads: Citizens United and the 2012 Elections</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/7995298/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/7995298/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/pbs?ref=rss&quot;&gt;PBS&lt;/a&gt; - By Evelyn Messinger - Oct. 16 (Opinion) - In 2012, two tidal waves will reconfigure the American electoral system and the news media that cover it. A tsunami made of money will buoy up the structure of entrenched political power, while a huge wave of personal technology will disrupt it.

I can predict both of these events with certainty because they've happened every election year over the last couple of decades. Still, the changes in 2012 may be dramatic. Angry citizens around the world have been using a potent combination of mobile phones, social networking and broadcast television to upend established political orders. Now it's Americans who are angry, and this election could spark a new level of activism leveraged by these same tools. At the same time, this will be the first general election since the so-called &quot;Citizens United&quot; Supreme Court decision, which tossed out the last vestiges of regulations limiting campaign financing. Among other effects, this will translate into a record numbers of attack ads next fall. Taken together, these two changes may profoundly affect our democracy, and they deserve a closer look.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/7995298?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.9 average&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/7995298?ref=rss&quot;&gt;4&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/7995298/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Elections</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Culture Wars</category>
      <category>Ethics in Journalism</category>
      <category>Fake News</category>
      <category>Journalism</category>
      <category>Presidential Election 2012</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Industries lobby against voluntary nutrition guidelines for food marketed to kids</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/6965020/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/6965020/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/washington_post?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt; - By Lyndsey Layton, Dan Eggen - Jul. 10 (News Report) - The food and advertising industries have launched a multi-pronged campaign to squash government efforts to create voluntary nutritional guidelines for foods marketed to children. Calling themselves the Sensible Food Policy Coalition, the nation&#8217;s biggest foodmakers, fast-food chains and media companies, including Viacom and Time Warner , are trying to derail standards proposed by four federal agencies. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce has also lent its lobbying muscle to the effort. The guidelines are designed to encourage foodmakers to reduce salt, added sugars and fats in foods and drinks targeted to children. If their products did not meet the standards, foodmakers following the guidelines would refrain from advertising them to ...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/6965020?ref=rss&quot;&gt;4.2 average&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/6965020?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/6965020/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>U.S. Economy</category>
      <category>Lobbying</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Corporate Governance</category>
      <category>Food</category>
      <category>Government</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why We Need the New News Environment to be Chaotic</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/6960817/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/6960817/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;shirky.com - By Clay Shirky - Jul. 10 (Opinion) - The business environment for newspapers continues to be grim. Pew recently reported that advertising revenue rebounded in 2010 for all forms of media, except newspapers.* This might just be a matter of transitioning from print to digital revenues but for the fact that the market values a print reader far more highly than a digital one. The more or less official label for this problem is &#8220;analog dollars to digital dimes&#8221;; because of the enormous difference in assumed value per reader, lost value from print is not made up for by gains in digital readership.

The &#8216;analog dollars to digital dimes&#8217; problem doesn&#8217;t actually seem to be a problem. It seems to be a feature of reality. Digital revenue per head is not replacing lost print revenue and, barring some astonishment in the advertising market, it never will. There is no supply-side scarcity to boost margins; power over aggregation has moved from producer to consumer; advertisers prefer selling cameras and shoes on purpose-built sites; readers feel the same about finding jobs and dates; and there are few commercial or geographic restraints on competition. The market values analog readers more highly than digital ones because the market is right.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/6960817?ref=rss&quot;&gt;4.1 average&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/6960817?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/6960817/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>U.S. Economy</category>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Finance</category>
      <category>Internet</category>
      <category>Citizen Journalism</category>
      <category>Journalism</category>
      <category>Mainstream Media</category>
      <category>New Media</category>
      <category>Social Networks</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Advertising Climate Change:A Study of Green Ads, 2005 - 2010</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/7074620/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/7074620/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/yale_environment_360?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Yale Environment 360&lt;/a&gt; - By Michael Svoboda - Jul. 05 (Research) - Yale Forum analysis of print ads from 2005 to 2010 suggests major advertisers closely tracked news coverage and public opinion on climate change, with &#8216;green&#8217; ads peaking in 2008-09 and returning to &#8216;background&#8217; levels in 2010. But most companies were reluctant to address the issue directly, preferring instead to tout reduced &#8220;emissions&#8221; and a &#8216;cleaner&#8217; environment. With one notable exception.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/7074620?ref=rss&quot;&gt;4.0 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/7074620?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Review&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/7074620/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Environment</category>
      <category>Media and Politics</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Climate Change</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Newspaper Publishers: It's Time To Embrace &quot;Fly-By&quot; News Readers</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/6705706/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/6705706/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;Business Insider - By Jay Budzik - Jun. 18 (Opinion) - Facing a steady decline in print revenues, news publishers have&#8232; struggled to build replacement revenue streams.
For more than a decade,&#8232; online business models that rely on free access and directly-sold&#8232; display advertising have shown promise, but failed to deliver a&#8232; profitable business, especially in light of the traffic dynamics of &#8232;news sites.&#8232;&#8232;
A recent report from the Columbia Journalism School, &quot;The Story So &#8232;Far: What We Know about the Business of Digital Journalism&quot;, gives an &#8232;excellent account of the history and current state of the industry,&#8232; analyzing existing and some emerging business models.
Online,&#8232; newspapers have struggled to recreate the kind of loyal relationship&#8232; with readers that they had in print. Print business models are built &#8232;on production and distribution channels that are capital intensive and &#8232;difficult to recreate.&#8232;&#8232;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/6705706?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.3 average&lt;/a&gt; (not enough reviews) - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/6705706?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Review&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/6705706/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Internet</category>
      <category>Journalism</category>
      <category>New Media</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The story so far: what we know about the business of digital journalism</title>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/6214860/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/6214860/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/columbia_journalism_review?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Columbia Journalism Review&lt;/a&gt; - By Bill Grueskin, Ava Seave, Lucas Graves - May. 10 (Special Report) - The difficult financial state of the U.S. news industry is no longer new. Most big newsrooms have faced severe cutbacks, and even though online-only outlets have sprung up in communities throughout the country, they haven&#8217;t fully taken the place of what has been lost.

These issues were explored in a precursor report to this one, sponsored by Columbia University&#8217;s Graduate School of Journalism and written by Leonard Downie Jr., former executive editor of The Washington Post, and Michael Schudson, a professor at Columbia. At the end of that report, which was published in late 2009, the authors provided a number of recommendations to stanch the losses in independent reporting.

Most of the recommendations were based in policy, including changes in the tax code to provide news organizations easier access to nonprofit status and encouraging philanthropists to support news gathering. Most controversially, Downie and Schudson recommended the creation of a national &#8220;Fund for Local News&#8221; supported with fees the Federal Communications Commission would collect from telecom users, broadcast licensees, or Internet service providers.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/6214860?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Not rated yet&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/6214860?ref=rss&quot;&gt;See&amp;nbsp;Info&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/6214860/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Journalism</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Facebook looks to cash in on user data</title>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/5937680/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/5937680/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/los_angeles_times?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/a&gt; - By Jessica Guynn - Apr. 17 (News Report) - Profiles, status updates and messages all include a mother lode of voluntarily provided information. The social media site is using it to help advertisers find exactly who they want to reach. Privacy watchdogs are aghast.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/5937680?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.0 average&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/5937680?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/5937680/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Internet</category>
      <category>Privacy</category>
      <category>Facebook</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Five myths about the future of journalism</title>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://newstrust.net/stories/5825198/toolbar?ref=rss</guid>
      <link>http://newstrust.net/stories/5825198/toolbar?ref=rss</link>
      <description>&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/sources/washington_post?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Washington Post&lt;/a&gt; - By Tom Rosenstiel - Apr. 09 (Opinion) - There are few things journalists like to discuss more than, well, themselves and the long-term prospects for their industry. How long will print newspapers survive? Are news aggregation sites the future? Or are online paywalls &#8212; such as the one the New York Times just launched &#8212; the way to go? As media organizations plot their future, it&#8217;s worth discarding some misconceptions about what it will take to keep the press from becoming yesterday&#8217;s news.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NewsTrust Rating: &lt;/b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/5825198?ref=rss&quot;&gt;3.7 average&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/5825198?ref=rss&quot;&gt;6&amp;nbsp;Reviews&amp;nbsp;&amp;raquo;&lt;/a&gt; - &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/stories/5825198/toolbar?ref=rss&quot;&gt;Review It&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/&quot;&gt;Visit NewsTrust&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about&quot;&gt;About&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/partners/feeds/rss&quot;&gt;Sign Up&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href=&quot;http://newstrust.net/about/disclaimer&quot;&gt;Disclaimer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <category>Global Economy</category>
      <category>U.S. Economy</category>
      <category>Advertising</category>
      <category>Journalism</category>
      <category>Mainstream Media</category>
      <category>New Media</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
