The Pentagon v. Peak Oil

The administration has, the company notes, "tethered operational capability to high-technology solutions that require continued growth in energy sources" -- and done so at the worst possible moment historically. After all, the likelihood is that the global energy supply is about to begin diminishing rather than expanding. Clearly, writes LMI in its April 2007 report, "it may not be possible to execute operational concepts and capabilities to achieve our ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Subjects: Business, World
Topics: Oil and Gas, War
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Jun 16, 2007 - 5:48 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Silhouette_sml
3.4
by Rebecca Hale - Jun. 21, 2007

It is easier to understand a country full of people on mood medication, when you understand the real compassionless insanity behind the present economic infrastructure.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.6
by Dwight Rousu - Jun. 16, 2007

The story presents an interesting dilemma: a war machine to protect (or steal) the oil needed by the war machine. Military planners beginning to accommodate to the probability that peak oil is a rapidly approaching energy inefficient train. Can the army wear green? Would they then need fewer invasions? Interesting.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.1
by Peter Breschard - Jun. 20, 2007
See Full Review » (9 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.3
by Mike LaBonte - Jun. 18, 2007

Evidence is good all around, loaded with links.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by William Ringer - Jun. 18, 2007
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
3.5
by Brian Grandin - Jun. 17, 2007

An interesting story worth reading, though I am unsure about the credibility and balance of claims made (like when addressing peak oil).

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.8

Good
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
3.8
Fairness
3.2
Information
3.8
Sourcing
3.5
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
4.2
Credibility
3.2
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
1.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!