Lies, Damned Lies, and ‘Fact Checking’

The liberal media’s latest attempt to control the discourse.

If you’ve ever found yourself engaged in a futile, one-sided argument with a politician on your TV screen, you’re hardly alone in your frustration. However, if you’re inclined to jot down such intemperate outbursts, and have the chutzpah to charge people for your services​—​you might have what it takes to join the ranks of one of journalism’s most popular and elite new breeds.

They call themselves “fact checkers,” and with the ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin - via Jay Rosen
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 32 (as of 2011-12-10)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - Dec 10, 2011 - 2:14 PM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Dec 11, 2011 - 1:08 PM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fred Gatlin
2.9
by Fred Gatlin - Dec. 14, 2011

While I agree that Fact Checking is hard to decide and most fact checking do not take time to look at complex issues and understand what has happened. I do not think that because more issues of facts for Republicans than Democrat’s is a problem.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Kristin Gorski
2.4
by Kristin Gorski - Dec. 14, 2011

Seems odd that the writer has trouble with mainstream media following key tenets of journalism, including accurately reporting facts and contextualizing statements made by public figures. If media outlets should not do this, what is their purpose? He seems content with having public figures, particularly conservative ones, say their pieces and let them stand without challenge, even when they are not true and need context in order to understand them better.

See Full Review » (18 answers)
Fabrice Florin
2.3
by Fabrice Florin - Dec. 11, 2011
See Full Review » (5 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.4

Poor
from 4 reviews (69% confidence)
Quality
2.4
Facts
2.0
Fairness
2.0
Information
2.2
Insight
2.2
Style
2.5
Accuracy
2.0
Balance
1.0
Context
2.7
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
2.0
Expertise
2.0
Originality
2.7
Relevance
2.7
Transparency
2.0
Responsibility
2.3
Popularity
2.4
Recommendation
2.2
Credibility
2.5
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!