Why Democrats Don't Count

The Exit polls said he won, but the “official” tally took his victory away. His supporters found they were scrubbed off voter rolls. Violence and intimidation kept even more of his voters away from the polls. Hundreds of thousands of ballots supposedly showed no choice for president — like ballots with hanging chads.

And the officials in charge of this suspect election refused to re-count those votes in public. Everyone knew full well a fair ... Full Story »

Posted by David Fox
Tags Help
Subjects: World, Politics, U.S.
Member Tags: Lopez Obrador, stolen election, florida, ohio
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by David Fox - Jul 14, 2006 - 4:35 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: David Fox - Jul 14, 2006 - 4:48 PM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
3.3
by David Fox - Jul. 14, 2006

Palast compares how Lopez Obrador is taking a very different approach to his "loss" than Gore and Kerry did. He doesn't offer any new information on the US elections of 2000 and 2004, but does make a good point on showing an alternative way of handling what many believe were stolen elections.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.3
by Mike LaBonte - Jul. 15, 2006

Palast includes little news in this piece, even though his Florida con Salsa video proves he has news to report. He mostly attacks the Democrats but could have included more evidence that Mexico's election may have been wrongly decided. The facts he presents on the 2000 and 2004 U.S. elections are familiar.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.0
by Fabrice Florin - Aug. 9, 2006
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Member_photo_thumb
2.9
by Rod Amis - Jul. 14, 2006
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.5
by Glenna Green - Jul. 21, 2006
See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Average
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.5
Sourcing
3.2
Style
4.0
Balance
2.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.4
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
2.8
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!