Barak Obama Lectures his Own

Honest to God, we need a long meandering religious rant from Barak Obama about as much as we need people blaming it all on Bill Clinton. Mother Mary, that's Sean Hannity's line!

And last time I looked Harry Truman didn't build a Democratic Party infrastructure; neither did Jimmy Carter or any other president in between. Oh, that's right, there wasn't another Democratic president between Carter and Clinton, let alone someone who won two terms. If ... Full Story »

Posted by Rod Amis
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics
Member Tags: Barak Obama, Religion in Politics
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 8
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 4
Opinions as factsHelp: 0
Number stakeholdersHelp: 0
Stakeholders quotedHelp: 0
Complimentary wordsHelp: 0
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Rod Amis - Jun 29, 2006 - 6:19 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
2.9
by Rod Amis - Oct. 1, 2008

Marsh wears her bias as a badge of honor, as this Blog post ambly demonstrates. What she does is advocacy blogging for the "progressive" wing of the Democratic Party. In this post, she takes umbrage at recent statements by the media's darling in the party, Senator Barak Obama. She casts her darts with acumen and a sharp tongue.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.5
by Richard Carlson - Oct. 1, 2008

Once you get through the flak, this story is about what Democrats should do to bring the religious right into the fold. The author is right, nothing. There is no need to pander to the rightwing religious zeolets, the democratic party is build on morality. Chistians of good faith can see that. The spinning of religious fervor would only ring false. She thinks Obama may be misguided. Good works is where its at.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.2

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (20% confidence)
Quality
3.1
Facts
4.0
Fairness
2.5
Information
3.0
Sourcing
2.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
1.2
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!