Is Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg Tone Deaf About Privacy?

Remember the uproar when Facebook made your list of friends, pages you are a fan of, gender, geographic region and networks publicly available to everyone? Now, the social networking behemoth has silently enabled facial recognition software without your permission under the rather benign tag "Suggest photos of me to friends." Even if you choose to disable the option, Facebook still will have the technical ability to connect your name with your image. Full Story »

Posted by Barry Grossheim
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 0 (as of 2011-06-15)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Barry Grossheim - Jun 15, 2011 - 11:25 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Beth Wellington - Jun 15, 2011 - 11:45 AM PDT
Chris Finnie
3.9
by Chris Finnie - Jun. 16, 2011

One point that isn't explored is what price we're willing to pay for "free" services. Companies have to "monetize" their services somehow. Or we have to be willing to pay for them. It's an issue media firms like the New York Times are grappling with as well. Otherwise a well-rounded piece.

After the constant complaints, you'd think they would have learned by now. But then you'd think that about congressmen too. Wonder if this accounts for the recent membership drop? People finally got the idea that this is how FB works.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Ann Wilmer
4.9
by Ann Wilmer - Jun. 15, 2011

Beth's articl highlights something that "early adopters" like me need to think about before they expose themselves to yet another invasion of privacy. I will now consult my IT guru about my FB privacy status and post a link to this article on FB!!

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Patricia L'Herrou
3.9
by Patricia L'Herrou - Jun. 15, 2011

i like the structure of this story. the writer intersperses her own takes on the ideas cited with experts' thoughts on the same. offering many reasons against the newest photo id policies of facebook, she also points out a change, over time, in mr. zuckerberg's own ideas about privacy. while she mentions the value of being on facebook, she discusses with references, how data-tracking is endemic in our society, the piece illustrates well how dangers to individuals' privacy are only likely to become greater with the newest policy at facebook.

i especially like the reference by cory doctorow, quoted here: " it embodies BF Skinner's famous thought experiment....lavishing you with attention from the people that you love...in service to a business model that cashes in the precious material of our social lives." this sums up so much of our new technological culture so well.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dan Kennedy
4.0
by Dan Kennedy - Jun. 15, 2011

Facebook's outrages against privacy are legion, and this is an excellent round-up.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
Barry Grossheim
4.0
by Barry Grossheim - Jun. 15, 2011

This is an in depth look at Facebook's new facial recognition software and the myriad privacy issues it entails.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Ben Ross
4.9
by Ben Ross - Jun. 16, 2011

Subject not cover adequately in MSM. as in the new banking and credit card consumers...opt in/ opt-out .....NO until I request it...it only makes sense....and thus mostly a thing of the past. Like the mountain tops

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Randy Morrow
4.3
by Randy Morrow - Jun. 15, 2011

Even if you choose to disable the option, Facebook still will have the technical ability to connect your name with your image. Mark Zuckerberg might say his company ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dwight Rousu
3.9
by Dwight Rousu - Jun. 15, 2011

Many also feel a user should always be opted out of new features automatically, and should then have to opt in themselves. But it is often the other way around when ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
John Warren
2.9
by John Warren - Jun. 18, 2011

information posted out to facebook is not private anymore. The decision to make something public should not be done by making changes to your settings on facebook but instead by not posting it on the web at all.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story (1)Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.2

Good
from 12 reviews (57% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Insight
4.2
Style
4.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
4.1
Originality
3.6
Relevance
4.5
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
4.4
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!