Charity or collaboration?

The New York Times has accepted free stories from ProPublica. It has endorsed a journalist getting help from the public via Spot.US to underwrite a story that might appear at NYTimes.com. And Poynter’s Bill Mitchell says the paper is even wondering about foundation support for its work (but for perspective, I suspect one could safely Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via Jeff Jarvis
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 2 (as of 2009-07-19)
Editorial Help
Posted by: via Jeff Jarvis - Jul 19, 2009 - 6:27 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Jul 22, 2009 - 10:37 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
4.0
by Fabrice Florin - Jul. 22, 2009

Thoughtful post about new, innovative ways in which journalists, philanthropist and the public are starting to collaborate to produce better news coverage. By focusing on collaboration, Jeff Jarvis helps clarify the debate surrounding charitable contributions to support journalism. Insightful perspective on the rapidly evolving news ecosystem.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
N617425703_5313_thumb
4.0
by Shawn Powers - Jul. 22, 2009

Nice way to re-frame the conversation re: the future of news. As usual, it is very Jarvis-centric, but that's not necessarily a ad thing. Would be interesting to draw comparisons to changes taking place in other industries for a more well-rounded perspective.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dscf2146_thumb
4.5
by Glenn LaBauve - Jul. 22, 2009

This raises many more questions than it attempts to answer, quite posssibly because no one knows the answers yet.

We should not minimize the editorial input that comes from knowing the slant of the reporter and the knowledge base of the reporter. Many inputs ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
P9110066_thumb
3.3
by Patricia Blochowiak - Jul. 23, 2009
See Full Review » (16 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.4
by Andrew Boggeri - Jul. 22, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
N1812091_2834_thumb
3.6
by Derek Hawkins - Jul. 22, 2009
See Full Review » (9 answers)
Look_up_thumb
2.5
by Stephen Babcock - Jul. 22, 2009

In Jarvis' news ecosystem, the prey do all the work for no money so the benevolent predator can supply them with the tools they need -- exposure and money. It's the first stab at journobiology I've seen, and I think the nascent field needs to review 10th grade biology before it makes it into classrooms at Berkeley, Columbia, Northwestern, and Mizzou. The key rule of the food chain is that the predator can always dominate due to its self-imposed superiority over all lower creatures.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 7 reviews (63% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
1.0
Fairness
2.0
Information
3.4
Insight
3.9
Style
3.6
Accuracy
1.0
Balance
1.0
Context
3.5
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
3.3
Originality
4.3
Relevance
4.2
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
3.2
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • One Newspaper, Many Checkbooks

    Lindsey Hoshan, a freelance journalist in Palo Alto, Calif., hopes to sell a multimedia slide show and maybe an article to The Times about the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, a ...
    Posted by Leo Romero
    4.0