WikiSecrets

(Video) It's the biggest intelligence breach in U.S. history -- the leaking of more than a half million classified documents on the WikiLeaks website throughout 2010. At the center of the controversy stands Bradley E. Manning, the Army intelligence analyst who's charged with handing them over.

Who is Bradley Manning, and what does his story tell us about how and why the secret cache of documents may have been leaked? In WikiSecrets, FRONTLINE ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin - via Foreign Policy (AfPak Channel ), Kaizar Campwala (t), Johan Jessen (t), Joey Baker (t), Alfredo Ramos Jr (t), Jeremy Caplan (t), Randy Benson (t), Umbreen Bhatti (t), Donica Mensing (t)
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - May 13, 2011 - 8:33 AM PDT
Content Type: Video
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - May 28, 2011 - 11:03 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabrice Florin
4.2
by Fabrice Florin - May. 29, 2011

Excellent Frontline documentary on the leaking by Bradley Manning of half a million classified documents to Wikileaks. This in-depth, hour-long report provides a factual overview of this event, including interviews with Manning, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, his former colleague Daniel Domscheit-Berg and other participants. Must-see TV.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Sky Black
2.4
by Sky Black - May. 30, 2011

"This story reads like it came out of Fox News." (I quote myself.) Actually I take that back. This from Fox today: "The Hacking group LulzSec claimed responsibility for the cheeky sting in retaliation for a PBS report critical of Wikileaks and suspected leaker Bradley Manning." Even Fox sees the program as a smear. Nothing new, not real Journalism. It is basically a smear (emphasizing Bradley Manning's fragile personality) pretending to be journalism.

See Full Review » (4 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 4 reviews (33% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.0
Fairness
2.5
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
5.0
Relevance
4.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
2.5
Credibility
5.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!