Time to Change The 'Back Channel'

Leave it to the New York Times to pronounce something "corrupt" and then wholeheartedly embrace it as "crucial."

This week's Sunday magazine piece by Max Frankel is the most recent and stunning example of the Times' weird worldview. In a cover story, the paper's former executive editor concludes that "the real lesson" of the recent Scooter Libby trial is that Washington's "black market in information" -- which the Times defines as "the messy and ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: Media, Politics
Member Tags: truth in advertising
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Mar 27, 2007 - 11:25 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Silhouette_sml
3.7
by Rebecca Hale - Mar. 27, 2007

Well this is a commentary on a commentary - Rory's thoughts about Max Frankel's thoughts, a former Editor of the NY Times, regarding ummm.... democracy is necessarily founded on evil? I have a hard time understanding the fake logic. So I think this is a good blog by Rory, to bring to the forefront the point that if the framework for journalism is gossip (the unsubtantiated innuendo coined as a fact), then the fruit, a democracy founded on freedom of the press with these values, will ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
2.7
by Chris Finnie - Mar. 27, 2007

Without having read the original article, it's hard to say how accurate this piece is. However, this story raises some interesting points. I just wish he'd follow them further. For example, exploring the "BigPolitics/Big Media equation" and how it serves "the reader, the citizen, and our democracy." Or whether the solution to the whole thing might not possibly be more transparency in our government.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Mar. 27, 2007
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by David Patterson - Mar. 27, 2007

The Priviledge of Public service. In the elitistcentric cycle we're in the Emphasis seems to be more on the "priviledge" rather than the service. Even less the public. In good OpEd writing the standard is the righteous indignation. Is it justified? Is the writing persuasive? In this example my answer is yes to both.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

Good
from 4 reviews (confidence not calculated)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.0
Fairness
2.0
Information
3.7
Sourcing
2.5
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
1.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!