Pelosi's gamble on Iraq war bill pays off

The House speaker's triumph was anything but assured when she announced the measure. Antiwar Democrats wanted an earlier deadline for withdrawal.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi faced an angry group of liberal lawmakers when she stepped into her red-walled Capitol office on the afternoon of March 8.

That morning, the San Francisco Democrat had announced plans to push legislation requiring President Bush to withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq by the end of August 2008 -- at the latest.

But the antiwar members of her party who gathered in the large conference room overlooking the National Mall ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics, U.S.
Member Tags: Pelosi prepares the pork
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Mar 24, 2007 - 7:25 AM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Silhouette_sml
2.0
by Jim Mac Donald - Mar. 24, 2007

Not enough is said about the Pig feed given for votes to barely squeek this one through. For balance it is sadly lacking. It is very sad to completely forget the men and women who need this funding to have it "purchased" for pork. Sadly both sides of this are clearly not represented.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.0
by Paul Stambaugh - Mar. 24, 2007

Very light on facts, mainly about who voted for what and not really any information about this bill.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
by Fabrice Florin - Mar. 24, 2007
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.5
by Leo Romero - Mar. 24, 2007
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Mar. 24, 2007
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
4.5
by Jami Dwyer - Mar. 24, 2007
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.0
by Robert Garcia - Mar. 27, 2007
See Full Review » (1 answer)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.1

Average
from 7 reviews (confidence not calculated)
Quality
3.0
Facts
3.5
Fairness
2.7
Information
3.3
Sourcing
2.7
Style
3.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
2.7
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.4
Credibility
3.4
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
1.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!