This is a well written and factual article. All we now from science still lack details of how the earth came about. Many changes cannot be completely understood. Perhaps God made the change.

An opinion piece intended to reconcile differences between creationism and science. An age-old dispute. The author’s premise is: “Evolution does not contradict the Bible unless you force an unreasonable interpretation on that ancient book.” That unreasonable interpretation being considering the bible a literal history of religion, thereby depriving one’s self of the bible’s real treasure: a great work of allegory.

There is practically no real journalism in this. It's a debate that relies almost completely on persons and research from long ago. The only mentions of the modern world are the 2010 Gallup poll and a $27 million dollar Creation Museum in Kentucky.

I do not think this is good journalism because although it was relevant and insightful, it did not offer me any real expert opinions or facts. And at the end it said the opinions were those solely based on the gentleman that wrote the piece.

I think the author successfully reignite the long-standing debate about the origin of humans and the universe. Although it is an opinion piece, I think he has a good scientific take on the topic and that he has some good evidence for his point (mainly secondary sources).