A good educative piece from The Times. Carbon sequestration is favourable however although many 'fret over the details.' It's not all that as it's the case for poring in carbon in a soda water bottle. Well, it's better than nothing, anyway.
This story left me with a feeling of "wait, what?" It was difficult to follow and I think it could have done a better job giving background and explaining why C.C.S. is important. It talked more about the scientific and geological side rather than overall environmental or social impact.
Well I did learn a lot about what they trying to do with the carbon now but, that's not why I consider this good Journalism. It does seem somewhat reasonable, I mean it's for the well-being of the environment, mostly and overall I like how he explains what most of the processes and items are and what they mean.