The Seinfeld Hearings

If you suspect this week's Senate confirmation hearings for Sonia Sotomayor will be, like "Seinfeld," a show about nothing, you are probably right. To understand why, we need to revisit an era that remade how lawyers and the public think about law, and especially the Constitution.

In the 1930s, academics developed a philosophy they called "legal realism" to undercut judicial resistance to "progressive" statutes such as laws restricting the hours a ... Full Story »

Posted by NewsTrust Staff - via Wall Street Journal (Most Emailed), Memeorandum
Tags Help
Member Tags: free, Sotomayor
Stats Help
# Diggs: 72 (as of 2009-07-13)
# Tweets: 0 (as of 2009-07-13)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by NewsTrust Staff - Jul 13, 2009 - 9:32 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.7
by Fabrice Florin - Jul. 13, 2009

Interesting opinion about how to make Supreme Court confirmation hearings more meaningful. The author, a Georgetown Law professor, makes a reasonable argument that we might learn more about nominees by asking them what various clauses of the Constitution mean to them - rather than ask them how they might rule on specific cases.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
2.8
by Dwight Rousu - Jul. 14, 2009
See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (27% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Information
3.5
Insight
4.0
Style
2.5
Context
4.0
Expertise
2.5
Originality
3.5
Relevance
3.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
2.8
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
2.5
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!