Fifth Fleet chief fears "miscalculation" by Iran

The outgoing commander of the US Navy's Fifth Fleet has expressed concern that a "miscalculation" by Iran in its nuclear standoff with the West could spark an armed conflict in the Gulf region. Vice Admiral Patrick M. Walsh, who also heads the US Naval Forces Central Command, told a small group of journalists at Fifth Fleet headquarters in Bahrain that Iran was more likely to threaten oil traffic through the Strait of Hormuz than mine the strategic ... Full Story »

Posted by Mark Monday

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Mmonday_thumb
4.1
by Mark Monday - Feb. 21, 2007

Historically, surprise attacks are not really a surprise. There are generally precursors that were simply unrecognized at the time. A statement by the outgoing head of the fleet that would would be involved in an attack on Iran that the doubling of offensive and defensive capabiliites in the form of a second carrier is “not necessarily a precursor to offensive actions” is the kind of comment that betrays an impending attack. The story is a decent one, not headed for the inbox at the Pulitzer judges' desk. Yet it may be far more important than one that gets the prize later. In time we will see how important that statement was, and whether the reporter should have placed it higher in the story, or even have led with it. "Not necessarily" has an ominous ring to it -- a "better than 50 percent" sound.

(13 answers)

Mark's Rating

Overall
4.1

Good
from 13 answers
Quality
4.0
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »