1.9

by Fabrice Florin - Feb. 21, 2007 - See Full Review (13 answers)

Notes: This misguided opinion piece largely misses the point. Not only does it unfairly stereotype democrats, but it presents opinions as facts to back up its assertions. On the whole, the author makes a mockery of a much-needed public debate about this important issue.

4.0

by Kaizar Campwala - Feb. 21, 2007 - See Full Review (1 answer)

1.0

by Chris Finnie - Feb. 21, 2007 - See Full Review (13 answers)

Notes: Rush must be so proud of this guy. What a load of bilge. The Courant should give up any pretense of being a "news" paper for giving him a public forum.

1.5

by William D. Walsh - Feb. 22, 2007 - See Full Review (6 answers)

1.2

by Wes Boyd - Feb. 21, 2007 - See Full Review (6 answers)

2.8

by Kyle Klipowicz - Feb. 21, 2007 - See Full Review (7 answers)

Notes: This is definitely biased toward the fearmongering war industry.

1.0

by Bonnie Britt - Feb. 21, 2007 - See Full Review (11 answers)

Notes: Why is the Tribune newspapers presenting poor writing? Convincing argument is constructed with detail, not broad unsupported generalization. This column offers no argument, just idle-crystal ball gazing in areas where the scribe, who could be a fifth grade student, brings no new information or insight. This is not journalism. It is a poor attempt to fill space with the very first words that popped into an elementary school student's head. This column wastes readers' time. Please ... More »

1.0

by Jennifer Williams DeBruhl - Feb. 22, 2007 - See Full Review (1 answer)

2.0

by Jami Dwyer - Feb. 21, 2007 - See Full Review (2 answers)