YouTube is good for TV

Buzzmachine - by Jeff Jarvis - Feb. 20, 2007 (Opinion)
The days of doing business by telling customers what they cannot do are nearing an end. If your customers want to watch your shows, listen to your songs, read your news, or play your games, can you still get away with telling them they cannot unless they come to you and use your devices, pay your fees, and follow your rules? That could work in a scarcity economy in which you owned all the stuff and the means to get it. But no more. Business isn't about ... More »
Review | Like | Submitted by Kaizar Campwala
Featured Reviews
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.8
by Fabrice Florin - Feb. 21, 2007 - See Full Review (12 answers)
Notes: Thoughtful opinion on Viacom's recent decision to pull its content off You Tube. Presents both sides of the issue fairly, though the comments section below this post makes some good points that go beyond the author's original post.

Member_photo_thumb
4.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Feb. 20, 2007 - See Full Review (11 answers)
Notes: An interesting piece, but does not give evidence, beyond his one anecdotal evidence, that the moves by Viacom are against their interests.
Kaizar submitted this story.

Silhoutte_sml
3.6
by Bob McInnis - Feb. 21, 2007 - See Full Review (13 answers)
Notes: An interesting summary of a previous article by the same author published in the Guardian. A bit of fact, a bit of humour and some speculation but worth a read.

More Reviews
Silhoutte_sml
4.0
by Ari Hakkarainen - Feb. 22, 2007 - See Full Review (1 answer)

Silhoutte_sml
(no rating) by Wayland T Washington - Feb. 25, 2007 - See Full Review (0 answers)

Silhoutte_sml
4.1
by Kevin Matson - Feb. 25, 2007 - See Full Review (5 answers)

Silhoutte_sml
5.0
by Norman Jenson - Feb. 20, 2007 - See Full Review (1 answer)

No quotes yet. Please review this story to add some!
No comments yet. Please review this story to add yours!
Tools

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:


(Beta) Ratings
Our Rating
3.8
(very good)
7 reviews

Quality
3.8

Accuracy
4.0

Balance
3.0

Context
4.0

Facts
3.0

Fairness
3.0

Information
3.5

Sourcing
3.0

Style
4.3

Popularity
3.9

Recommendation
4.3

Credibility
4.0

# Reviews
3.5

# Views
1.6

# Likes
1.0

# Emails
1.0


How our ratings work