Health-Care Reform's Public Support Problem

"If you can't reform the employer tax exclusion," a well-connected health-care reform advocate told me a few months ago, "you can't find the money to reform the health-care system." Harry Reid is now saying that there will be no reform of the employer tax exclusion. So can we still reform health care?

Probably. By this point in the process, Max Baucus had backed so far down on the exclusion that it was going to raise only $300 billion or $400 ... Full Story »

Posted by Samuel W. Velsor IV
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Samuel W. Velsor IV - Jul 9, 2009 - 8:39 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Jul 9, 2009 - 9:33 AM PDT
Derek Hawkins
3.7
by Derek Hawkins - Jul. 9, 2009

Klein points out that Americans are ambivalent to Obama's proposed health care reform because they aren't sure that it would change or improve their current health care. What he doesn't quite articulate here is that Obama's main aim is to insure the uninsured, not dramatically improve the situation of people who have adequate insurance.

Klein can be so wonkish he's hard to follow unless you've been reading him regularly. But there are few people covering the health care reform debate as thoroughly as he is.

But health-care reform isn’t simply suffering because the public is overly opposed to some of its revenue raisers. It’s suffering because the public is ... More »

See Full Review » (14 answers)
Samuel W.  Velsor IV
4.5
by Samuel W. Velsor IV - Jul. 9, 2009

This is what is called; Hitting the Nail on the Head!

I totally agree with all that Ezra Klein has said in spades. That said it is to true that Congress and specifically Sen Reid are way to early in the game are bowing to pressure over the Tax of Benefits. This should be left to a floor debate not the committees.

I’m gripped, however, by a more unsettling thought. Reports are that Reid dropped the employer tax exclusion because polling was so bitterly opposed (probably in part ... More »

See Full Review » (16 answers)
Patricia Blochowiak
2.2
by Patricia Blochowiak - Jul. 11, 2009

Vague. Doesn't mention conflicting polls. Not backed by references.

See Full Review » (18 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Average
from 4 reviews (60% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
1.0
Fairness
2.5
Information
3.5
Insight
3.8
Style
3.2
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
1.0
Context
3.0
Depth
2.5
Enterprise
1.0
Expertise
3.7
Originality
3.2
Relevance
4.2
Transparency
1.0
Responsibility
3.5
Popularity
3.3
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Discord on Health Care Dulls Luster Of New Pacts - washingtonpost.com

    The Obama administration, hoping to boost its health-care reform effort with financial concessions from the hospital and pharmaceutical industries, is instead confronting deep ...
  • Thought Rationing

    Two weeks ago, President Obama offered to cut several hundred billion more dollars out of the Medicare and Medicaid budget to help make room for health care reform. This sort ...
    Posted by Derek Hawkins
  • What will health reform mean for reproductive rights?

    As the House and Senate produce and mark-up various health reform plans, reproductive health care is emerging -- surprise, surprise -- as a political football. Both the House ...
    Posted by Derek Hawkins
  • From FDR to Obama, a fight for health care

    As Congress takes on President Obama’s call for overhauling health care, the desire for change will be tested — by the expense, by politics, by resistance from doctors and ...
    Posted by Kristin Gorski
  • President Obama's rocky path to health-care reform

    President Obama's welcome home from his latest successful overseas trip is clouded by the growing doubts about his most important domestic initiative, the overhaul of the ...
    Posted by Kristin Gorski