Why I had to quit the John Edwards campaign

Salon - by Amanda Marcotte - Feb. 16, 2007 (Special Report)
During my brief tenure as blogmaster for a Democratic presidential contender, I experienced the right-wing smear machine firsthand
I announced that I was taking the job on Jan. 30, and the same week, I noticed a small flare-up of oddly aggressive and misogynistic comments in my moderation queue over a short, irritated post I wrote about the coverage of the Duke lacrosse rape case on CNN. I assumed that some anti-feminist blogger had linked me and so, in frustration, I went and rewrote my by-then week-old post to mock the commenters by spelling out my views in childish, ... More »
Review | Like | Submitted by Aldon Hynes
Featured Reviews
N1126433387_2982_thumb
2.9
by Dale Penn - Feb. 16, 2007 - See Full Review (8 answers)
Notes: This piece seems overly long and self-serving. People have the right to write in as coarse a manner as they wish on their blogs, but with every action comes consequences. While those on the right are likely just as evil as she complains, she can't blame them for giving them ammunition by cursing like a sailor. The nature of politics is to look for your opponents weak points and make the most you can out of them. She understandably didn't want to be one of those weak points for the ... More »

Member_photo_thumb
4.7
by Aldon Hynes - Feb. 16, 2007 - See Full Review (13 answers)
Notes: This is a more balanced story than I would expect from a person who has been driven out of a job by right wing extremists intent on shutting down informed political discourse. It is extremely important in terms of what will happen in the 2008 presidential election and provides great background. Note: I am very biased on this. I have close ties to the Edwards campaign, and have set up the "I am Amanda Marcotte" group on Facebook.
Aldon submitted this story.

Member_photo_thumb
3.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Feb. 16, 2007 - See Full Review (12 answers)
Notes: This is well written, and worth the read. It's important to get the story from Marcotte's perspective. That being said, she doesn't back up the thrust of her argument- that the campaign against her was part of a larger program of misogynistic smearing of feminists- with anything more than her own anecdotal evidence. That's a strong claim to make without substantive data to back it up.

Silhoutte_sml
2.7
by Robin 'Roblimo' Miller - Feb. 16, 2007 - See Full Review (7 answers)
Notes: "Self-serving" is a great description of this piece. As insight into the mind of an unrestrained non-journalist with a blog, it was great. But as a view of the real world.... the "no one gives us young female bloggers a chance because we aren't white males" tone showed an amazing disconnect from reality. The last "new media" conference I attended had young, female bloggers all over the place, handily outnumbering Ms. Marcotte's stereotypical "30-something nerdy young white men who ... More »

Silhoutte_sml
3.8
by Ben Ross - Feb. 17, 2007 - See Full Review (7 answers)
Notes: No suprise here. Nothing about the cadidate , campaign or anything else truly new. Expressing strong opinions against the positions heald by the far-right puts you in a feeding frenzy of crackpots. After the swiftboat thing she was suprised?

Silhoutte_sml
3.6
by Bob McInnis - Feb. 16, 2007 - See Full Review (13 answers)
Notes: Considering Amanda Marcotte's proximity to the story and the first person rendition, it seems to be a fair explanation of the perils of partisan political blogging.

Silhoutte_sml
3.8
by Cheri Henderson - Feb. 19, 2007 - See Full Review (7 answers)
Notes: I am disappointed that these 2 women resigned over nothing but hot air from people whose own history is full of unacceptable rhetoric. My own attitude tends to be: bring it on, jerks.

More Reviews
Silhoutte_sml
3.8
by Kenneth Hittel - Feb. 18, 2007 - See Full Review (5 answers)

Silhoutte_sml
5.0
by Wayland T Washington - Feb. 24, 2007 - See Full Review (1 answer)

Silhoutte_sml
4.0
by Jami Dwyer - Feb. 16, 2007 - See Full Review (7 answers)
Notes: Maybe I missed it, but she doesn't discuss John Edwards at all, not her perception of him before, during, or after this brouhaha. I like Amanda Marcotte, but I'm more interested in John Edwards, given that I'm being asked to cast a vote for the guy for President.

Silhoutte_sml
5.0
by Bora Zivkovic - Feb. 16, 2007 - See Full Review (1 answer)

Silhoutte_sml
4.8
by Tim Egan - Feb. 16, 2007 - See Full Review (7 answers)
Notes: The only reason I didn't give this article all 5's is that I sense a little bit of personal bias in Ms. Marcotte's words. What is that bias? I'd rather not say but rather allow the readers to decide for themselves. I believe she is a _____ hater.

Tags Help
Topics Media, Politics, U.S. | Blogs, Presidential Election 2008
Member Tags campaigning, right wing nutjobs
Research Help
Search Sites Google | Yahoo | Technorati | Wikipedia | del.icio.us
Stats Help
Editorial Help
Submitted by Submitted by Aldon Hynes - Feb 16, 2007 - 6:16 AM PST
Reviewed by Aldon Hynes (review), Kaizar Campwala (review), Bora Zivkovic (review), Dale Penn (review), Jami Dwyer (review), Bob McInnis (review), Robin 'Roblimo' Miller (review), Tim Egan (review), Ben Ross (review), Kenneth Hittel (review), Cheri Henderson (review), Wayland T Washington (review)
Edited by Dale Penn - Feb 16, 2007 - 9:28 AM PST
No quotes yet. Please review this story to add some!
No comments yet. Please review this story to add yours!
Tools

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:


(Beta) Ratings
Our Rating
3.5
(very good)
12 reviews

Quality
3.5

Accuracy
4.0

Balance
2.8

Context
3.4

Facts
3.3

Fairness
3.8

Information
3.8

Sourcing
4.1

Style
4.0

Popularity
3.8

Recommendation
4.1

Credibility
4.2

# Reviews
5.0

# Views
1.0

# Likes
1.0

# Emails
1.0


How our ratings work