NY Times publisher: Our goal is to manage the transition from print to internet

what began as a casual chat ended in a fascinating glimpse into Sulzberger's world, and how he sees the future of the news business.

Given the constant erosion of the printed press, do you see the New York Times still being printed in five years?

"I really don't know whether we'll be printing the Times in five years, and you know what? I don't care either," he says. Full Story »

Posted by Aldon Hynes
Tags Help
Subjects: Media
Member Tags: NYTimes
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Aldon Hynes - Feb 8, 2007 - 5:49 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Feb 8, 2007 - 7:33 AM PST

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Silhouette_sml
3.7
by Rory O'Connor - Feb. 8, 2007

A fascinating look inside the mind of the man in control of the New York Times. I would have liked to hear other voices assessing both the man and his ideas, however.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.8
by Bill Mitchell - Feb. 9, 2007

Interesting piece, but unclear whether this was a chat in an elevator, a recorded interview or what. Not really clear whether the reporter got these quoes from Sulzberger directly or whether they were uttered during a session at Davos.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.0
by Aldon Hynes - Feb. 8, 2007

The article presents a fascinating look into the future of journalism. As an interview Sulzberger, it doesn't present a lot of background or other views, but what it does present is very important.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.0
by Fabrice Florin - Feb. 8, 2007
See Full Review » (1 answer)
N1126433387_2982_thumb
4.5
by Dale Penn - Feb. 8, 2007
See Full Review » (8 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.1
by Mark Mayhew - Feb. 8, 2007
See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
3.5
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.4
Sourcing
3.6
Style
3.7
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.2
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!