Goldman Invests in Facebook at $50 Billion Valuation

(Blog Post) New money will give Facebook power to steal away employees, develop products and possibly pursue acquisitions, all without being publicly traded. Full Story »

Posted by Jon Mitchell - via Slatest, Google Blogsearch (Business), Memeorandum, Google News (Business), miker1717 (t), Salvador Sala (t), Mark Pegrum (t), Fabrice Florin (t), Jason Samfield (t), Umbreen Bhatti (t), Patrick McDermott (t), Seth Roberts Farber (t), Josh_Young (t), Kaizar Campwala (t), David K. Miller (t), Steve Murray (t), Johan Jessen (t), David Wardell (t), Malorie Jae Lucich (t), Megan Taylor (t), Harit Modi (t), urmi das (t), sudaneseonline (t), Ellie Kesselman (t), Wil Kristin (t), Ish Harshawat (t), Thanh Tran (t), Phylora Uppman (f), Beverli Williams (f), Jon Mitchell (f), Seth Roberts Farber (f), David Fox (f), Mehmet Ekrem Koseterzi (f), Tiffany Hebb (f), Steven K Samra (f)
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Diggs: 139 (as of 2011-01-03)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Jon Mitchell - Jan 2, 2011 - 10:16 PM PST
Content Type: Blog Post
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Jon Mitchell - Jan 3, 2011 - 8:35 AM PST

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jon Mitchell
3.7
by Jon Mitchell - Jan. 3, 2011

It's balanced coverage, but not quite balanced enough. It does seem to react to the announcement with the appropriate level of shock, but it doesn't raise the specter of the tech bubble or discuss how much Facebook is really WORTH in any concrete sense.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Fred Gatlin
3.1
by Fred Gatlin - Jan. 3, 2011

This story appears to be factual, but in my opinion it lacks key facts. It does not include financial facts or look at problems on Facebook.

See Full Review » (19 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

Good
from 7 reviews (64% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.8
Fairness
3.8
Information
3.0
Insight
3.5
Sourcing
3.2
Style
3.6
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
2.5
Context
3.5
Depth
3.5
Enterprise
3.2
Expertise
3.5
Originality
3.0
Relevance
3.8
Transparency
3.5
Responsibility
3.5
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
3.9
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!