Wrong Way on Health ’Reform’

It’s hard to know whether Obama’s proposal is naive, hypocritical or simply dishonest.

... uncontrolled health spending is almost single-handedly determining national priorities. It's reducing discretionary income, raising taxes, widening budget deficits and squeezing other government programs. Worse, much medical spending is wasted, the CEA report says. It doesn't improve Americans' health; some care is unneeded or ineffective. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Member_photo_thumb
3.8
by Kaizar Campwala - Jun. 17, 2009

A criticism of Obama's approach to health care reform. Samuelson's critique doesn't come off as ideological, but is in fact rather rational. Unfortunately, he doesn't go into his own proposal to control costs starting with Medicare, so we're left with no alternative plan to compare.

The central cause of runaway health spending is clear. Hospitals and doctors are paid mostly on a fee-for-service basis and reimbursed by insurance, either private or governmental. The open-ended payment system encourages doctors and hospitals to provide more services — and patients to expect them. It also favors new medical technologies, which are made profitable by heavy use. Unfortunately, what pleases providers and patients individually hurts the nation as a whole.

What’s needed is a fundamental remaking of the health-care sector — a sweeping “restructuring” — that would overhaul fee-for-service payment and reduce the fragmentation of care.

The place to start would be costly Medicare, the nation’s largest insurance program serving 45 million elderly and disabled. Of course, this would be unpopular, because it would disrupt delivery patterns and reimbursement practices. It’s easier to pretend to be curbing health spending while expanding coverage and spending. Presidents have done that for decades, and it’s why most health industries see “reform” as a good deal.

(14 answers)

Kaizar's Rating

Overall
3.8

Good
from 14 answers
Quality
3.6
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Style
4.0
Context
3.0
Expertise
2.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »