2 election workers convicted in '04 tally

A jury found two Cuyahoga County elections workers guilty Wednesday of charges that they skirted Board of Elections procedures to thwart a countywide ballot recount after the divisive 2004 presidential election. Full Story »

Posted by Mike LaBonte
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics
Topics: Election Reform
Member Tags: 2004 election
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Mike LaBonte - Jan 25, 2007 - 7:55 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Mike LaBonte - Jan 25, 2007 - 10:35 AM PST

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
2.9
by Marty Heyman - Jan. 25, 2007

This is a factual report of the result of the trial. It has little of the perspective needed to put the report into perspective. This is an issue of the faith of the US (and Ohio) citizen trust in the election process.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.8
by Mike LaBonte - Jan. 25, 2007

Facts are mostly correct. Mentions "some Internet bloggers" without specifics. Repeats the obviously unsupportable claim that the election workers' actions did not affect the outcome of the 2004 election. Since 97% of the ballots were not recounted there is no way to know if the election would have been reversed.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Mmonday_thumb
3.7
by Mark Monday - Jan. 25, 2007
See Full Review » (12 answers)
Biopic-portrait-sm_thumb
2.4
by Kelly Garrett - Jan. 25, 2007
See Full Review » (9 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.2
by Autumn Carlson - Jan. 26, 2007
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
1.4
by Jami Dwyer - Jan. 25, 2007

Most biased story I've read yet on NewsTrust. Goes out of its way to pity poll workers who broke the law by rigging a recount. Appalling.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.0

Average
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.0
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.2
Information
3.3
Sourcing
2.8
Style
2.8
Accuracy
3.7
Balance
2.8
Context
2.6
Popularity
3.1
Recommendation
3.3
Credibility
2.5
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
1.4
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!