Democracy seen threatened by new authoritarianism

China, Iran, Russia and Venezuela form a clique of authoritarian states that use their wealth and influence to undermine global democracy and rule of law, a study by U.S.-funded agencies said on Thursday. "Policymakers do not appear to appreciate the dangers these 21st century authoritarian models pose to democracy and rule of law around the world," said the study by Freedom House, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, and Radio Free Asia, all prominent U.S. ... Full Story »

Posted by Walter Cox
Tags Help
Member Tags: World Democracy
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Walter Cox - Jun 4, 2009 - 9:39 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Walter Cox - Jun 4, 2009 - 9:44 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
New_headshot_thumb
2.5
by Dan Kennedy - Jun. 4, 2009

A very thin story that makes no mention of the fact that the worldwide plunge in oil prices has greatly diminished the influence of three of the countries mentioned: Iran, Venezuela, and Russia. There's also no link to the report that is this story's sole source, even though it's readily available. (I have added it to Links.)

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.7
by Walter Cox - Jun. 4, 2009

This article makes clear that as China, Iran, Russia and Venezuela emerge as economic powers that are not committed to Western democratic models, the West must be on guard lest they partner to destroy democratic institutions worldwide.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
2.9
by Kaizar Campwala - Jun. 4, 2009

Overly reliant on a single study. Without adequate perspective from other sources. Moreover, this kind of broad claim needs to be contextualized better than it is in this Reuters wire report.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
P1000885-2_thumb
2.9
by Patricia L'Herrou - Jun. 5, 2009

many statements made here as in one example " targets include the u.n., the osce, and the oas" , are not backed up with any facts or analysis of how they are targeted, nor with what effect. there are some facts here about particular behaviors of these nations, particularly china, but no evidence about their goals re: democracy, and no mention that a primary goal for most of these behaviors would be consistent with global marketing.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
by Fabrice Florin - Jun. 4, 2009
See Full Review » (4 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
1.5
by Chris Finnie - Jun. 4, 2009

Well, at least it was good for a laugh. Since the reverse of democracy is often authoritarianism, the headline promised no stunning insights. And the article delivered none. Without knowing who put the report together, or what they based the conclusions on, it was hard to evaluate its worth. And the article, unhelpfully, never says.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.8

Average
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
2.8
Facts
3.3
Fairness
2.8
Sourcing
2.2
Style
2.5
Context
2.4
Depth
2.3
Enterprise
2.2
Relevance
2.8
Popularity
3.1
Recommendation
2.7
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Undermining Democracy (Pending)

    Posted by Dan Kennedy
  • Some thoughts on democracy/authoritarianism day

    Sometimes the news-cycle fates align nicely to highlight a question deserving of more discussion. Today, that question was what role democracy promotion should play in the ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala
    3.9
  • Israel papers: new era in US ties

    One writer called on the Israeli government to adapt to the new winds blowing from Washington or face a storm, while several said the US president had given the government ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala
    3.6