Does Obama want a fight over settlements?

Israel's position, or its hope, is that this issue can be finessed, just as it was finessed under the previous government. Or, as Netanyahu told a visiting Congressional delegation on Wednesday, there is a need to find a way with the US administration to enable "normal life" in the settlements to continue. If Obama says no settlements, but doesn't mention natural growth, leaving Clinton to do that, does that mean there is wiggle room? Nobody knows yet. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - May 28, 2009 - 6:23 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - May 28, 2009 - 7:18 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
N1812091_2834_thumb
3.3
by Derek Hawkins - May. 28, 2009

This analysis is more detailed than what we usually see. The author asks some important questions, drawing insightful comparisons between Bush era policy and Obama's emerging approach to politics in the region. Almost no reference to the Palestinian government or population, which kills the story's fairness.

Seems to willfully neglect the Palestinian perspective. Irresponsible.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.5
by Kaizar Campwala - May. 28, 2009

A 'realpolitik' analysis of Obama's position on settlements, this piece makes some great historical connections between Bush era policies and possibilities for Obama's foreign policy. It's utterly devoid of the Palestinian perspective, but it does a good job of explaining the Israeli government's motivations and posturing.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dscf2146_thumb
3.6
by Glenn LaBauve - May. 28, 2009

Writing as an Israili for an Israili audience, the writer takes a middle ground, but for an international reader, I believe it shows a hope that the US comes down on their side.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
P9110066_thumb
2.3
by Patricia Blochowiak - May. 28, 2009

Accurately portrays only the Israeli position.

See Full Review » (19 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.2

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Facts
3.0
Fairness
2.0
Information
2.0
Insight
2.0
Sourcing
3.2
Style
3.2
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
1.0
Context
3.8
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
2.8
Expertise
3.0
Originality
2.0
Relevance
4.2
Transparency
2.0
Responsibility
2.0
Popularity
3.1
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Closer to statehood

    For the first time a new prime minister's visit to the US doesn't look like fun. Back in Israel everyone is worried. The new US president is different from his predecessors. ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala
    3.4
  • Challenge of Israeli settlements

    More and more Israelis have moved to the West Bank and East Jerusalem since 1967 when Israel captured and occupied the territory. This is illegal under international law. ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala
    4.0
  • Israeli Settlement Growth Must Stop, Clinton Says

    The Obama administration reiterated emphatically on Wednesday that it viewed a complete freeze of construction in settlements on the West Bank as a critical step toward a ...
    Posted by Kaizar Campwala
    3.9