Obama's Warfare State

Although the United States is not in imminent danger of attack from any country, President Barack Obama’s first budget further expands the Pentagon’s already dominant global operations. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - May 21, 2009 - 6:02 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - May 21, 2009 - 6:02 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dscf2146_thumb
3.6
by Glenn LaBauve - May. 23, 2009

A well reasoned attack on military spending, but it is no better done than the right wing attacks on social spending. DoD budgets are one of the most convoluted and misleading items in the goverment. We built the interstate highway system as a national defense network, at one time we funded nearly 50 % of all R&D at universities with DoD dollars, we did much of the R&D for NASA with DoD dollars, and we established and maintain the GPS system with DoD dollars. That is not ot say ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.9
by Chris Finnie - May. 21, 2009

Good facts, but I was disappointed Ross didn't draw his conclusion more clearly. Though clearly insane, why do we continue to spend all this money on the Navy? On other armaments we don't need?

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Dwightskagitspring_thumb
4.7
by Dwight Rousu - May. 23, 2009

The hard hitting essay looks at the world military dictatorship that seems to be US policy, and is continuing to grow under Obama.

“Aggression” is the only word for it and the Middle East’s oil supply is the only reason for it. The Pentagon is on its way to tighten its control of the world – ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.6
by Randy Morrow - May. 23, 2009

The author has valid points and backs them up (to some extent) but he would be more convincing if he took specific arguments for weapons systems, manpower, bases, etc. and attempted to refute those specific arguments of the need for an individual thing.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.9
by James Canning - May. 21, 2009

Very fine encapsulation of stunning collective idiocy of the US public in supporting an insane level of "defense" spending matching the rest of the world combined.

This story underlines the astounding ignorance of the American public, and the continuing squandering of trillions of US tqaxpayer dollars on ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

Good
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.2
Fairness
3.8
Sourcing
3.5
Style
4.0
Context
4.2
Depth
3.8
Enterprise
4.2
Relevance
4.5
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.2
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!