Deep but scattered in some parts. A triage of information didn't seem to take place in this article. This only implies why NAM has fallen silent on climate change legislation (now moot since the Senate's postponed debate until spring) when it should have sought something more definitive. There's plenty about why they're opposed to the House bill, but I wonder if ClimateWire even asked some of its sources why NAM won't take a stance on the Senate version. The article hints that it's about self-preservation, but it's midway through the second page.

somewhat disappointing, the problem with this article isn't the sourcing or the factual information. it is the writing -- often vague in places, without enough detail in specific references making it somewhat difficult to grasp a point, and quotes not directly related to the point. i'd like to have read a more focused piece.

I learned a lot about the U:S. situation and the current discussion in reading this serious and readable article. Although the article does not delve too much into the details of planned environmental measures and their forseeable impact, one gets a quite clear picture of the main problems.