Unscientific American: US Almost Last in Understanding Evolution

Americans rank next-to-last on a survey of 34 nations' acceptance of evolution as a scientific fact. (See the chart, below.) Our awareness of this scientific reality has actually gone down over the past 20 years, no doubt as a result of the so-called "intelligent design" movement and other Christian fundamentalist campaigns. In fact, frequent churchgoers in the US are most likely to doubt evolution. How will their children - and ours - become the great ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: Sci/Tech
Editorial Help

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
N1126433387_2982_thumb
4.5
by Dale Penn - Jan. 19, 2007

Science is under attack. That seems factual to me, regardless of where one's opinions lie in the "debate" over evolution vs intelligent design. This article does a good job of showing the standing of the US in the world on this matter.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Melva Hackney - Jan. 20, 2007

I have never understood why some people try to force everyone to choose between God and Evolution. Why would anyone believe that God could not have created the Earth- AND when finished, set His planned evolution into motion? Surely no one believes that the oxygen level today is the same as it was at Creation? Or that the animals, plants, trees of today are the same as at the Beginning?? Mr. Holland put into words what I have always believed all thinking, reasoning people who are ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.4
by Oliver Jones - Jan. 23, 2007

News flash: it's damnably silly that so many Americans believe that Biblical accounts of creation have to be evaluated on the same modern criteria of truth as scientific accounts. But this article fails to address WHY biblical literalists have set themselves so intensively against science. Isn't it better to try to bridge this gap than just to curse it?

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.1
by Myrna E. Watanabe - Jan. 20, 2007

This is an opinion piece--an equivalent of an op-ed--and it need not conform to the requirements for good journalism, for which I am grateful. As a biologist, college teacher of biology, and journalist, I do not understand why, in a story about science, our standard publications, such as The New York Times, are required to show "both sides" of the evolution story. There is only one side and that side is the science. This opinion piece makes it clear that there is science and there is ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.5
by Beth Jones - Jan. 22, 2007

I think a blog-opinion piece can nonetheless be a good example of journalism and this one, I believe, qualifies. It offers its fact-based hypothesis and then backs it up with varied, multiple, credible/verifiable sources, including facts about/quotes from the opposing side. On a personal note, as a former biology/zoology major, I find this issue extremely important for the future of the American education system, not to mention our society. It is appalling how religious grandiosity ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Jan. 19, 2007
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Wayland T Washington - Jan. 23, 2007
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Gene Ulmer - Jan. 22, 2007
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
3.9
by Vernon Funkhouser - Jan. 20, 2007

Well written from an unkhown source to this reviewer.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.2

Good
from 9 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.5
Sourcing
4.2
Style
4.5
Accuracy
3.5
Balance
3.0
Context
4.2
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
4.6
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
4.5
# Views
1.2
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!