Short View: Obama's first 100 days

(Video) A comparison with FDR's first 100 days Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Apr 29, 2009 - 8:13 AM PDT
Content Type: Video
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Apr 29, 2009 - 8:13 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
N1812091_2834_thumb
3.5
by Derek Hawkins - Apr. 29, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
by Fabrice Florin - Apr. 29, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.2
by Kaizar Campwala - Apr. 29, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Dscf1547_thumb
3.5
by Manfred Ostrowski - Apr. 30, 2009

As it was to be expected, one sees quality with bias.

Comments of Financial Times do not really offer a clearcut way out of financial crisis, so I wonder wether economists really know what would be the ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.1
by Lindsey Gross - Apr. 30, 2009

It is Informative and it gives an general outlook on Obama and the Economy.

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.6
by Lukas Eggen - Apr. 29, 2009

Yes it is quality journalism, it is a very interesting way of looking at Obama's term. I like that it was video, I think that it makes it much more effective in this case than print.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.7
by Jena Greenburg - Apr. 30, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.0
by Gerald E. Martinson - Apr. 30, 2009

I would not have used this comparison.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.6
by Jade Sheldong - Apr. 29, 2009

yes because it is very factual although the reporter is a little boring

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Good
from 9 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.7
Fairness
3.6
Information
3.0
Insight
2.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.7
Depth
3.4
Enterprise
3.3
Expertise
3.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
4.3
Transparency
2.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.3
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
4.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!