David Broder and media culpability for Bush crimes

Salon by Glenn Greenwald | Apr. 26, 2009 (Opinion)

What Broder states today as fact (that the Bush presidency is "one of the darkest chapters of American history") is almost verbatim that which, when it mattered, when it was happening, he vehemently and repeatedly denied -- and, of course, given that he works in the most accountability-free profession of all (establishment punditry), he does not even have the minimal honesty to acknowledge that. Like so many of his colleagues, Broder played a critical ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: Media, Politics
Topics: Ethics in Journalism, Media and Politics
Member Tags: Media and War Crimes
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Apr 27, 2009 - 7:28 AM PDT
Reviewed by: Dwight Rousu (review), Kenneth Sibbett (review), Tanya J. Maurer (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Apr 27, 2009 - 7:28 AM PDT
Like | | | Comments

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
4.6
 by Dwight Rousu - Apr. 27, 2009

Greenwald argues persuasively that the big corporate media punditry supported or enabled the bush war crimes and trashing of the constitution.

Bush officials didn’t commit these crimes by themselves. Virtually the entire Washington establishment supported or at least enabled most of it More »

Dwight posted this story.
See Full Review » (16 answers)
Download_thumb
4.7
 by Kenneth Sibbett - Apr. 28, 2009

Mr. Greenwald is one of the foremost writers in the media who are shouting for investigations in torture. This great articile, is, again, a call to Obama and Holder to appoint a special proscecutor.

Brooks again has stuck his foot in the right side of his mouth. How can someone be so wrong about something and pretend that it never happened. Like ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.2
 by Tanya J. Maurer - May. 5, 2009
See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.5

Good
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
4.5
Information
4.3
Insight
4.3
Style
4.7
Context
4.7
Expertise
3.3
Originality
5.0
Relevance
4.7
Responsibility
4.7
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
4.7
Credibility
4.7
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!