In The Air

Earth Day has lost its edge and, with that, the sense that a different world is possible. Even more than in 1970, what’s needed now is an outpouring that organizes itself—with millions of people and, for good measure, some stinky dead fish in the streets. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
N1812091_2834_thumb
4.1
by Derek Hawkins - Apr. 22, 2009

A solid op-ed -- effective combination of background, data, insight, and not too much voice. Fits some key observations about government, environment and the public into a concise piece.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.9
by Fabrice Florin - Apr. 22, 2009

Interesting op-ed on how American public attitudes about the environment have changed since Earth Day was first celebrated 39 years ago. The author offers some good insights on that shift, backed up with factual evidence from expert sources, as well as helpful context to put this issue in perspective.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Apr. 22, 2009

Kolbert crystallizes the relationship between government and the public regarding the importance of environmental stewardship. Great background on Earth Day's past glory, along with polling data about the environment's priority in the minds of Americans today.

Polls show that voters regard the environment in general, and climate change in particular, as, at best, middling concerns. In a recent survey, the Pew Research Center ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Kgavataraz_thumb
4.3
by Kristin Gorski - Apr. 22, 2009

Compelling and well written. Recalls the flavor of the first Earth Day's "edge" and urgency, accurately contrasting it to the relative lack of enthusiasm of 2009's celebration. Framed fully by focused context.

The first celebration of Earth Day, on April 22, 1970, was a raucously exuberant affair. In New York, Fifth Avenue was closed to traffic. People picnicked on the sidewalk; ... More »

See Full Review » (14 answers)
Desktop_shot_a_25__thumb
4.1
by Marsha Iverson - Apr. 22, 2009

Fitting comparison between the popular sentiment during Earth Day #1 and #39.

As someone who remembers the first Earth Day well, I can also compare changes in social trends, information sources, and dramatic differences in the ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
N827168367_3876_thumb
3.8
by Subramanya Sastry - Apr. 22, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Colorphil_thumb
3.8
by phil bannister - Apr. 22, 2009

I think this is a particularly good article because it draws you inward with the backdrop of history at the beginning before moving onward to the present day, which is an effective writing technique which allows the reader to stay interested while making relevant points. The reading therefore has good content and flow.

I do think global warming should be a higher concern among Americans and the rest of the world than it is today. While I am Libertarian minded, I ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.8
by Hannah Fluitt - Apr. 27, 2009

Very interesting incorporation of separate issues. Stressed the relevance of global warming through a humorous avenue.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Sharon Kaplan - Apr. 22, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.7
by Katherine Devereaux - Apr. 29, 2009

The journalist contrasts what Earth Day once was to what Earth Day now is. He provides excellent examples from the first Earth Day that clearly represent a different society of Americans. He also provides examples of this years Earth Day and, when compared to 1970's Earth Day, seem overtly mild. The journalist also is able to weave Obamas "green dream team" which offers the reader hope... but is later checked when the reader discovers that "regulating C02 using existing laws ... More »

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.2
by Matthew McClure - Apr. 26, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.3

Good
from 11 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.1
Insight
4.4
Style
4.4
Context
4.3
Enterprise
3.0
Expertise
3.5
Originality
3.8
Relevance
4.4
Responsibility
4.5
Popularity
4.4
Recommendation
4.6
Credibility
4.3
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
2.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!