Whose Team Is It, Anyway?
Pro-choice voters have been taking one for the team for too long now. Enough already. Full Story »
Posted by Chris Finnie - via Markos Moulitsas, The Nation
Tags
Topics:
Women, Human Rights, Religion and Politics, Abortion, Health Care
Stats
# Diggs:
6 (as of 2009-11-13)
Editorial
Posted by:
Posted by Chris Finnie - Nov 12, 2009 - 2:12 PM PST
Reviewed by:
Chris Finnie (review), Ryan Jefferson (review), Randy Morrow (review), Harry A Farr (review)
Content Type:
Article
Edit Lock:
This story can be edited
Edited by:
Derek Hawkins - Nov 21, 2009 - 10:36 AM PST
To:
Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.
Note:
Never known for her demure style, Pollitt lets out all the stops on this one. It's a good expression of feminist rage.
…but those majorities would not be there, and Obama would not be in the White House, if not for prochoice women and men—their votes, talent, money, ... More »
Chris posted this story.
See Full Review »
(15 answers)
The two abortion procedures that are commonly used, medical and chemical, are very cheap, simply because of their relative ease to perform. I don't think there should be that much of a fight over this issue. The author disagrees and it seems as if she would be willing to take down all of the potential bills over the abortion issue.
Why should antichoicers be the only people who get to refuse to let their taxes support something they dislike? More »
Retrieving Comments
NT Rating
| My Rating
Ratings
Topics
Politics | Women | Human Rights | Religion and Politics | Abortion | Health Care | World | U.S. | Living | Health | Religion
(See these related stories.)
Links
Links
No links yet. Please review this story to add some!
