Sandy Berger: What Did He Take and Why Did He Take It?

Some things cry out for explanation. Like finding $90,000 in marked bills in a Congressman's freezer. Or finding out that a blue-chip lawyer who held one of the most important jobs in the nation was willing to risk his career, his livelihood, and his liberty to steal, hide, and destroy classified documents. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Other, Politics
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Jan 15, 2007 - 9:15 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Silhouette_sml
3.2
by Peter Henry - Jan. 15, 2007

The evident anti-Clinton bias in this blog makes it more difficult to assess the credibility of serious allegations against Sandy Berger. It's undeniable that Berger deliberately illegally took classified materials away with him from the National Archives, in conjunction with the work of the 9-11 Commission. It's unknown exactly what this material was, and why it was so important that Berger went to some lengths to obtain it. This is an important matter which is worthy of further ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Silhouette_sml
1.0
by Patricia Phillips - Jan. 15, 2007
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Member_photo_thumb
3.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Jan. 15, 2007
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
3.4
by Autumn Carlson - Jan. 16, 2007
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
2.4
by Eric Campbell - Jan. 15, 2007

Raises legitimate questions with a strong anti-Clinton bias.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
1.8
by Susan Acito - Jan. 15, 2007

operative word here should be "copies" of the report. Nowhere does it say that he took the originals and destroyed them, just three of five copies.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.8

Average
from 6 reviews (confidence not calculated)
Quality
2.8
Facts
4.0
Fairness
2.2
Information
3.0
Sourcing
2.5
Style
3.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
2.0
Context
2.5
Popularity
2.7
Recommendation
2.5
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
1.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!