Unanimous ruling: Iowa marriage no longer limited to one man, one woman

The Iowa Supreme Court this morning unanimously upheld gays’ right to marry.

“The Iowa statute limiting civil marriage to a union between a man and a woman violates the equal protection clause of the Iowa Constitution,” the justices said in a summary of their decision. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: Living, U.S.
Member Tags: Iowa
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Apr 3, 2009 - 8:09 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Apr 3, 2009 - 8:13 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

N1126433387_2982_thumb
3.8
by Dale Penn - Apr. 3, 2009

Well written regional story with national implications. Well balanced with quotes from all sides, the author could have spent more time explaining the legislative steps required to amend the Iowa constitution (see link provided).

Such an amendment requires the votes of a simple majority in both the Iowa House and Iowa Senate in two consecutive sessions, followed by a passing vote of the people of ... More »

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Dscf2146_thumb
4.2
by Glenn LaBauve - Apr. 7, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
by Fabrice Florin - Apr. 3, 2009
See Full Review » (3 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.9
by Kaizar Campwala - Apr. 3, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
N1812091_2834_thumb
3.8
by Derek Hawkins - Apr. 3, 2009
See Full Review » (4 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.9
by Tanya J. Maurer - Apr. 5, 2009
See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.0
by Naomi Isler - Apr. 3, 2009

Interesting - partly because it looks as though Vermont is about to make it four states now having gay marriage. The California court hasn't spoken yet, has it? Not having read the judicial opinion in Massachusetts, I found the Iowa judges distinguishing between civil and religious authorities interesting and useful.

The U.S. is a family oriented culture. The plaintiffs in this case, and other similar cases, are people who want to form families!

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Normheadshottight_thumb
3.0
by Norman Rogers - Apr. 3, 2009

Of course the decision is comical - judicial usurpation of power in the extreme.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 8 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
3.8
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
3.8
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.8
Depth
3.4
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.2
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.4
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »