The Woman Who Could Nail Bush: Are the Worst of the Torture Memos Still to Come?

The GOP is threatening an ugly fight over an Obama Justice Department appointee who wants to disclose more Bush-era torture memos.

The real reason for their vehement opposition is that Johnsen is committed to overturning the Bush administration’s policies on torture and warrantless surveillance, which would clip the wings of the imperial presidency. Even more menacingly (from their perspective), she is committed to shining a light on some of the darkest skeletons of the Bush years. Already, publication of OLC memoranda authorizing torture, approving warrantless surveillance, and ... Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., World, Politics, Religion
Member Tags: politicalization of the justice department
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Mar 31, 2009 - 2:09 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Mar 31, 2009 - 2:09 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
4.5
by Dwight Rousu - Mar. 31, 2009

The story looks at Republican opposition to Dawn Johnsen an faux grounds and provides the panoramic background of bush league ideas of law. It shows that disdain for open government and for the rule of law has become ingrained as policy of the Republican party.

The justice department appointments are some of the most encouraging Obama appointments for those who support the rule of law. That the ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.3
by Tanya J. Maurer - Mar. 31, 2009
See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.2
by Ian Gordon - Mar. 31, 2009

It contrasts the Bush Administration stance with Obama's. It contrasts and compares. When a previous policy is heinous it should be brought to the public's attention.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.3

Good
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
4.3
Facts
3.7
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.7
Sourcing
3.5
Style
4.5
Context
5.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
5.0
Popularity
4.3
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!