EPA orders employees to remove YouTube Climate Video

Agency Threatens Discipline for Off-Duty Warnings on Cap & Trade Failures

The video, entitled “The Huge Mistake”, is by Laurie Williams and Allan Zabel, two EPA enforcement attorneys speaking as private citizens. The video explains why the cap & trade plan endorsed by President Obama will not accomplish its goals, Full Story »

Posted by Ben Ross
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 2 (as of 2009-11-09)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Ben Ross - Nov 9, 2009 - 5:56 PM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Nov 10, 2009 - 2:26 PM PST

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
4.3
by Dwight Rousu - Nov. 9, 2009

The PEER press release reveals Obama administration censorship of EPA employees who posted their views, clearly identified as personal views.

A think they have a freedom of speech right, even as EPA employees. I also agree that cap and trade is deeply flawed, and carbon fees with rebates ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
N638965977_3994_thumb
4.0
by Ben Ross - Nov. 9, 2009

Press release....government attempt to stop employees from saving our lives...I think it is valid and under reported. And thus good journalism..provides link to video.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dscf2146_thumb
3.2
by Glenn LaBauve - Nov. 9, 2009

The author has little knowledge of the civil service statutes or choses to ignore them, and while I may disagree with those rules, every civil servant is either required to follow the rules or not and accept the consequences. If this leads to a law change, that is what civil disobeience is about.

I agree with the intent of the couple, and the changes are not material to the arguement. Had this been GWB admin, they would be down at Gitmo for ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.8

Good
from 3 reviews (35% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.7
Sourcing
3.3
Style
4.0
Context
3.3
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.7
Relevance
4.7
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.3
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!