Why Brands Can’t Be Trusted

Internet users put considerable trust in search engines as the online equivalent of traditional gatekeepers. But most are not even aware that sponsors pay for their links or that most search engines do no verification whatsoever of the information links they offer. Full Story »

Posted by Rory O'Connor
Tags Help
Member Tags: Media and Credibility
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Rory O'Connor - Mar 19, 2009 - 7:50 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Rory O'Connor - Mar 19, 2009 - 7:50 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.8
by Fabrice Florin - Mar. 19, 2009

Informative article on how trusted brands influence the way that people find credible information online. The author cites recent studies by researchers at Northwestern University and the University of California -- including NewsTrust advisor Kelly Garrett, from Ohio State University. Interesting perspectives based on extensive studies from multiple sources on a topic that is becoming increasingly important.

Disclosure: Rory O'Connor is a colleague and was Editorial Director at NewsTrust in 2007-2008.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Jack_dinkmeyer_thumb
3.6
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Mar. 19, 2009

The writing falls apart at the end. Still, it’s an important subject users don’t really understand. They also don't appreciate how invasive is Microsoft, easily able to enter their computers, pulling all the data they want. My personal problem with Google is that it isn’t much of a search engine.

Long ago when I was at university and the Information Age was only an obscure concept, a professor described information creation and distribution ... More »

See Full Review » (20 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Mar. 19, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.4
by Randy Morrow - Mar. 20, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.0
by Rebecca Hale - Mar. 19, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 5 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.6
Facts
3.6
Fairness
3.8
Information
3.8
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.8
Style
3.6
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.4
Depth
3.2
Enterprise
3.6
Expertise
4.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.6
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!