Solving the jobs crisis

Not even the gloomiest predict that today’s slump will approach the severity of the Depression, which shrank America’s economy by more than a quarter, and put a quarter of the working-age population out of a job. But with the world in its deepest recession since the 1930s and global trade shrinking at its fastest pace in 80 years, the misery of mass unemployment looms nonetheless, and raises the big question posed in the Depression: what should ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Mar 13, 2009 - 8:36 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Mar 13, 2009 - 8:36 AM PDT
Jack Dinkmeyer
2.6
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Mar. 14, 2009

A befuddled article--the author concentrating on massive global unemployment, stating that it will blight the lives of millions for years to come. What should governments do? His answer–in the long term–is make it easier for businesses to fire people. He woefully underestimates unemployment rates, predicting 10% by year’s end–not understanding those no longer looking for work are no longer counted, making true unemployment about 19%..

What everyone overlooks is that during the depression even those with jobs were barely squeaking by–with salaries averaging between $3 and $6 a week.

That will mean abolishing job-subsidy programmes, taking away protected workers’ privileges and making it easier for businesses to restructure by laying people off. More »

See Full Review » (21 answers)
Kenneth Sibbett
3.9
by Kenneth Sibbett - Mar. 13, 2009

A great article that's just as well written as it is projecting the future economy of the U.S. and the world. Jobs, Jobs, Job,. Thats the future of any government. What is needed, where it's needed, and who can get it their first.

Obama and co. had a pretty good week. But this is going to be an up and down economy for the next few years. Everyone still has to remember the Mortgage crisis, and the people who have nowhere to live.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Paul Keene
3.1
by Paul Keene - Mar. 13, 2009

A reasonable story but with a few flaws, as would be expected from a right leaning corporate friendly publication. The writer states that the current (8.1%) unemployment rate is nowhere near the depression's 25% rate. Unfortunately, the writer does not or did not look into the way the rate was and is now calculated. If you calculate the rate the way it was done during the depression, then the current rate is about 20% not 8.1%. In addition, there is very little effort in the stimulus to keep workers in jobs that will be going away, most job money is for shovel ready projects and the retraining for the greener jobs of the future. And finally, there is a lot of emphasis put on how the policies of the FDR administration (that ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Derek Hawkins
4.0
by Derek Hawkins - Mar. 13, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

Good
from 8 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.6
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.6
Information
3.7
Insight
2.0
Sourcing
2.0
Style
3.3
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.0
Expertise
1.0
Originality
2.0
Relevance
2.0
Transparency
1.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.4
Recommendation
3.4
Credibility
3.6
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!