This is an important, but tired critique. The historical information is important, but how about bringing some new information to light?

Herbert puts the economic politics of the last 30 years into clear perspective.

What drivel. Despite being accurate in his assessments of the right's shady dealings, the author absolve via omission any responsibility on the part of the Democratic Party.

sort of a polemic, preaching to the choir. might be good to prod discussion among groups with diverse or nonexistent views on the question.

I love an insightful story that doesn't cut corners nor betray the main thrust of the article and underlying premise by driving the point home.

Quality is low because it does not dive deep enough into factual analysis or informed insight. It is focused on spurring partisan commentary.