Many Still Believe That Saddam Hussein Was Behind 9/11, and Now We Have Some Idea Why

Of 49 people included in the study who believed in such a connection, only one shed the certainty when presented with prevailing evidence that it wasn't true.

The rest came up with an array of justifications for ignoring, discounting or simply disagreeing with contrary evidence — even when it came from President Bush himself. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Nov 6, 2009 - 12:48 AM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Tanya J. Maurer - Nov 14, 2009 - 10:08 PM PST

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Riehl_small_1__thumb
3.3
by Richard Riehl - Nov. 6, 2009

There's not enough information about the study to assess it's validity, nor is there any reporting on what a variety of others think the results mean. It does explain why information alone doesn't change people's minds. I wish it had been deeper into an analysis of why the town hall meetings were such a disaster. The final sentence suggests they wouldn't have had to be.

See Full Review » (19 answers)
P1000885-2_thumb
3.6
by Patricia L'Herrou - Nov. 6, 2009

this is interesting and researching for this type of information is relevant for all of us. this is only one study which seems to offer important aspects of our cognitive behavior on which to focus more research.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Fred_gatlin_thumb
4.0
by Fred Gatlin - Nov. 6, 2009

This is a well written and most interesting article. I have been aware of this issue for some time. The story confirms what I have learned. Simon and Garfinkel wrote a song called The Boxer. Parts of the words are 'All lies in jest until a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest,'

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.8
by Walter Cox - Nov. 6, 2009

One need look no further than a collection of NewsTrust reviews to find substantive evidence of what this article calls ""motivated reasoning" — pursuing information that confirms what we already think and discarding the rest. I believe that overcoming the natural human tendency to engage in motivated reasoning should be central to NewsTrust's mission.

My own personal discipline is to access a wide variety of news sources, with a special emphasis on those sources that I find uncomfortable, even ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.8
by Chris Finnie - Nov. 6, 2009

I've always heard that studies this small don't offer statistically significant results. Still, I found the concepts and results interesting.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.7
by Dwight Rousu - Nov. 6, 2009

Badger reports on a study trying to understand why some people's beliefs are not disturbed by facts. Quite interesting, but not as deep as one might hope. The report itself looks more informative.

they were actively engaged in reasoning that the belief they already held was true. More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
N1812091_2834_thumb
3.5
by Derek Hawkins - Nov. 9, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.2
by Randy Morrow - Nov. 6, 2009

Interesting but the survey group was very small.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
N628474479_7734_thumb
4.1
by Joel Kulenkamp - Nov. 6, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.1
by Tanya J. Maurer - Nov. 14, 2009
See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.1
by James Canning - Nov. 6, 2009

More evidence of astonishing ignorance of most Americans about the wider world, and what is actually happening in that world. The Bush administration had a field day playing the American public for fools, with of course a good deal of help from prostitute news media.

Osama bin Laden wanted Saddam Hussein killed. Yet many idiot Americans think Saddam was the pal of al-Qaeda.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 11 reviews (64% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
3.9
Fairness
3.8
Information
4.0
Insight
3.0
Sourcing
3.4
Style
3.8
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
2.0
Context
3.5
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.8
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.2
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.9
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help