Canadian Oil Sands

Once considered too expensive, as well as too damaging to the land, exploitation of Alberta's oil sands is now a gamble worth billions.

Nowhere on Earth is more earth being moved these days than in the Athabasca Valley. To extract each barrel of oil from a surface mine, the industry must first cut down the forest, then remove an average of two tons of peat and dirt that lie above the oil sands layer, then two tons of the sand itself. It must heat several barrels of water to strip the bitumen from the sand and upgrade it, and afterward it discharges contaminated water into tailings ponds ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Mar 3, 2009 - 12:38 AM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Mar 3, 2009 - 12:38 AM PST

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
N1812091_2834_thumb
3.9
by Derek Hawkins - Mar. 3, 2009

A somewhat slow moving, but detailed, thorough story on Canada's oil sands. Does a fine job documenting the environmental impact of exploiting the sands and explaining the economics behind the industry.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.7
by Dwight Rousu - Mar. 3, 2009

The destruction of the northern Alberta environment to feed the U.S. addiction to oil is presented in a way that shows the scope. The grandeur of the destruction comes across in the article and pictures. The climate change effects story is muted.

Canadian mining interests seem to have political dominance over environmental advocates up north. There seems to be a free market short term ... More »

But the free market does not consider the effects of the mines on the river or the forest, or on the people who live there, unless it is forced to. Nor, left to itself, ... More »

See Full Review » (14 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.5
by Mike LaBonte - Mar. 4, 2009

A nicely told story. There are enough sources, but at least half of the facts are not clearly attributed. viewpoints from both sides of the issue are included, although the pro-tar sand side seems to get somewhat shorter tracts of representation.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Pc140105_thumb
4.9
by Shawn McConnell - Mar. 4, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.2
by Kaizar Campwala - Mar. 3, 2009
See Full Review » (4 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.4
by Paul-André Raymond - Mar. 3, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)
N628474479_7734_thumb
4.5
by Joel Kulenkamp - Mar. 3, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.3
by Tanya J. Maurer - Mar. 4, 2009
See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.0
by Evan Langhorst - Mar. 3, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.4
by Kevin Reed - Mar. 3, 2009

The journalist pretty much has the picture of the current situation in the Alberta Sand Oil industry

Alberta needs a 1 Gigawatt "power plug" from Space Based Solar Power (SBSP) and US Solar Power from New Mexico and other southwestern states. GW ... More »

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.6
by michel labbe - Mar. 5, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.2

Good
from 11 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.4
Fairness
3.9
Information
4.5
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.2
Context
4.4
Depth
4.2
Enterprise
4.4
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
4.3
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
2.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!