Bridging the gap

black students remain outnumbered by their white counterparts at GW by nearly 9 to 1, and many said in interviews that the disparity causes feelings of separation inside and outside the classroom. Full Story »

Posted by Sean Nixon
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S.
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Sean Nixon - Feb 26, 2009 - 6:42 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Feb 26, 2009 - 8:14 PM PST

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kgavataraz_thumb
3.4
by Kristin Gorski - Feb. 28, 2009

An insightful look into a significant part of the college experience for black students at GWU. Some of the statistics -- only 7% of the student population is black; nationally, only 44% of black males graduate from college -- spoke clearly to what this student population is facing.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Resizedhs_thumb
2.6
by Tamika Thompson - Feb. 26, 2009

Even at a student newspaper, when an article states that "About 80 percent of the University's faculty are white and less than five percent are black" and that the school has "low retention rates among the black population, particularly among males," the article must also present the university's point of view either through an interview or statement. This article presents the voices of Black students who feel isolated very well, but does not balance that with the university's side.

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Sean_in_the_city_thumb
3.5
by Sean Nixon - Feb. 26, 2009

The writer works to balance both sides of the issue and gives a clear assessment of the challenges G.W. faces. The article also provides statistics on the numbers of black faculty members who have received advanced degrees and have yet to become faculty members at the institution.

The experience however is real and at times felt by many Black students across the country.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.2

Average
from 3 reviews (30% confidence)
Quality
3.3
Facts
3.3
Fairness
3.3
Information
3.7
Insight
2.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
2.0
Context
3.0
Depth
2.5
Enterprise
2.5
Expertise
2.0
Originality
2.0
Relevance
3.0
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
2.0
Popularity
2.8
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
2.7
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!