Was Pasternak's Path To The Nobel Prize Paved By The CIA?

Did the CIA fund a Russian-language publication of Boris Pasternak's "Doctor Zhivago" in order to help the dissident author win the Nobel Prize? Ivan Tolstoi, a literary historian and correspondent with RFE/RL's Russian Service, has spent the better part of two decades trying to find out. Tolstoi's research has resulted in a book, "The Laundered Novel: Doctor Zhivago, Between the KGB and the CIA,” which was recently published in Russia. In this ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Member_photo_thumb
2.5
by Lewyn Li - Feb. 21, 2009

The piece can be divided into two halves: the first half describes the journalist's own history with Boris Pasternak's "Doctor Zhivago" as he was growing up; the second half somewhat summarizes his arguments for a role of the CIA in Zhivago's publication in Russian. Personally, I found the first half far more interesting and credible. The second half consists of a lot of speculations about WHY the CIA would be interested in humiliating the USSR, but little in terms of actual evidence of CIA's involvement. The journalist says that "I felt I had collected enough evidence to support my suspicions: that the first Russian edition of "Doctor Zhivago" had been published by the CIA", but does not mention any of it in the article.

The piece raises the question of the relationship between politics and literature, which I think is an under-appreciated topic. Pasternak was generally lionised in the western press as a heroic defender of free expression and artistic integrity against a repressive regime, and his Nobel prize was taken by some to support the view that great art is incompatible and will triumph over totalitarianism. The same process applied to Solzhenitsyn and his Nobel later on. Of course, this view failed in the case of Mikhail Sholokov and his Nobel. And of course, few in the West gave a stuff about the contradiction.

(9 answers)

Lewyn's Rating

Overall
2.5

Poor
from 9 answers
Quality
2.3
Facts
2.0
Information
2.0
Sourcing
2.0
Style
3.0
Context
3.0
Depth
2.0
Popularity
3.0
Recommendation
3.0
More How our ratings work »