Doctor's Orders?

Critics of comparative effectiveness research, which the government has been funding for decades, claim that it will lead to treatment being approved or denied based on costs. Proponents say it will improve the quality of care and can, in some cases, show that more costly treatments aren't as effective as less expensive alternatives.

We can't predict what will happen in the future, but we can say that several claims being made about the impact of ... Full Story »

Posted by Mike LaBonte

See All Reviews »

Review

Andy von Salis
4.7
by Andy von Salis - Mar. 2, 2009

This is not a fun read, but it is quality research and reporting. Its focus remains on the ball, so broader perspectives are omitted. It excels in thoroughness - you couldn't ask for more - yet it is well-organized enough to give plenty of information to a skimmer, not just to a reader.

FactCheck has done its job. It's on us, now, to pick up what they've said and convey it to the public - since hardly anyone is likely to plow through the entire report. Healthcare is a particularly vulnerable area for extremists to sow fear through misinformation. There are no simple issues, fact or policy, in healthcare. Only a patient and thorough effort across a wide range of sources can yield a fair assessment of any healthcare fact analysis or policy proposal. This is where FactCheck is invaluable. It debunks a truly diabolical misinformation campaign by those with political and/or selfish goals barely related (if at all) to healthcare.

See All Reviews »

Andy's Rating

Overall
4.7

Very good
from 12 answers
Quality
4.7
Facts
5.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
5.0
Sourcing
5.0
Style
4.0
Context
4.0
Depth
5.0
Enterprise
5.0
Popularity
4.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
5.0
More How our ratings work »