Afghanistan: Now what?

In the first round of balloting, Afghan President Hamid Karzai received 1 million "ghost votes" from people who simply didn't exist. When those were eliminated, he lacked the requisite plurality and was pressed by his Western backers into agreeing to a runoff -- only to see his challenger drop out in anticipation of further fraud. Faced with a one-man race, the Independent Election Commission on Monday canceled the second round and returned Karzai to power ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S.
Stats Help
# Tweets: 6 (as of 2009-11-03)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Nov 3, 2009 - 7:46 AM PST
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Nov 3, 2009 - 7:47 AM PST

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Photograph_-sirajul_islam_thumb
3.9
by Sirajul Islam - Nov. 4, 2009

I like this editorial of LATimes because they've recommended what is best possible for America to pick up. There's many places and projects to do business with, and USA should leave to think that wars are their best businesses.

See Full Review » (18 answers)
N1812091_2834_thumb
3.5
by Derek Hawkins - Nov. 3, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Dscf1547_thumb
4.3
by Manfred Ostrowski - Nov. 4, 2009

This brief statement of LA Times opinion offers the basic facts of recent events concerning Afghanistan in a straightforward way, then it gives a point of view of what now should be U.S. policy towards the Afghans and their government. The proposal seems to be very sincere and sounds quite convincing, still one would have wished for more detail.

I think the LA Times editorial is right: President Obama "must .. help develop a more decentralized administration". The new government should be ... More »

Decentralization would allow the West to spread its resources to regional leaders rather than concentrating them in the hands of Karzai and his clique. More »

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.3
by James Canning - Nov. 3, 2009

A significant flaw in this piece is its assumption it is up to the US to deal with Afghanistan. No mention of Nato, or India, or Iran, even though many countries are involved in trying to bring minimum stability to Afghanistan.

Every thousand US troops costs $1 billion per year, if they are in Afghanistan. This is idiotic spending when other countries are much better able ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.8
by Alex Pelfrey - Nov. 9, 2009

Being an opinion piece yes I think this does the job. I feel like it brought down a lot of facts backed by opinion but then gives the reader an opportunity to make their own decision.

I am not surprised that this voting has been such a mess. A country can't be forced to have elections and then have them go smoothly. This is ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.8

Good
from 5 reviews (56% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.5
Insight
4.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.0
Depth
4.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
3.5
Relevance
4.0
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.6
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!