Iran's Nuclear Response Creates a Quandary for Obama

If the Obama Administration had hoped to get the bulk of Iran's current stockpile of enriched uranium out of the country under a new agreement for reprocessing abroad, those hopes are fading fast. The counter-proposal offered by Iran on Thursday contained such substantive revisions that Western officials are interpreting it as a rejection — at least of the aspect of the deal most important to the Western powers. More worrisome, perhaps, for the future of ... Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 21 (as of 2009-10-31)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Derek Hawkins - Oct 31, 2009 - 9:29 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Oct 31, 2009 - 9:32 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
N1812091_2834_thumb
3.5
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 31, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.9
by Brock Mann - Nov. 1, 2009

This is quality journalism because it goes in depth about a very pertinent issue. However, it gives only one hyperlink to jump to another source. Also, the paragraphs are quite lengthy filled with alot of jargon. I think the story would read much easier if the there were double the paragraphs, but each paragraph half as long. The overall article is very well done though, getting to the heart of the matter and telling views from many angles.

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.4
by Judith Bello - Oct. 31, 2009

I think it is quality journalism because it shows that there are two sides to the story. This shouldn't be such a big deal, but most stories on Iran paint them as demons with no reasonable perspective. This story hints at that perspective, but at least states enough facts so that the reader can draw their own conclusion.

It would seem ridiculous to expect that Iran would just ship out 75% of their enriched uranium. Any hard feelings on their decision are because we ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

Good
from 3 reviews (27% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.5
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.5
Style
3.0
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.5
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.5
Expertise
4.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
4.5
Transparency
3.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.3
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!