Memo reveals commander's fears

The most senior British soldier to die in Afghanistan foreshadowed his own death by warning that a shortage of helicopters was endangering troops.

Less than a month before he was killed by a roadside bomb, Lieutenant Colonel Rupert Thorneloe told his superiors that soldiers would die because they were being forced to take more trips by road. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via The Guardian
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics, World
Topics: Afghanistan, War
Member Tags: World news, uk news, bob ainsworth, defence policy, military, guardian.co.uk, news
Editorial Help
Posted by: via The Guardian - Oct 31, 2009 - 4:15 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Oct 31, 2009 - 8:44 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Riehl_small_1__thumb
3.2
by Richard Riehl - Nov. 1, 2009

The missing piece in this story is not enough sourcing to establish whether, in fact, the MoD has had requests for helicopters it's turned down. Without that it's simply a "he said," "he said" story. Thorneloe's leaked memo, although interesting in itself, is just the beginning of the story.

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.6
by Randy Morrow - Nov. 1, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
N1812091_2834_thumb
4.0
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 31, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.3
by Patrick McGuire - Oct. 31, 2009

The article treats perspectives of more helicopters is afir light.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.8
by Brock Mann - Nov. 1, 2009

This is good quality journalism because it has an opening that catches the readers eye, along with short paragraphs that keep the attention. The story is also very relevant because it shows that not only American lives are being lost but lives all throughout the world. It's a compelling story, but a very sad one.

See Full Review » (19 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

Good
from 5 reviews (53% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.8
Information
3.5
Insight
3.5
Sourcing
3.8
Style
3.5
Accuracy
3.5
Balance
3.0
Context
3.8
Depth
3.2
Enterprise
3.2
Expertise
3.5
Originality
3.0
Relevance
4.5
Transparency
2.5
Responsibility
3.5
Popularity
3.6
Recommendation
3.6
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »

Topics

(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!