Trade Could Be Key For Afghanistan And Entire Region

Both U.S. General Stanley McChrystal and President Barack Obama have affirmed the need for "economic" and "governance" measures in Afghanistan.

They're right, of course. Without them Washington's stated goals -- to destroy Al-Qaeda and cripple the Taliban -- remain purely negative and not compelling to most Afghans, to the countries neighboring Afghanistan, or even to its NATO allies. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Silhouette_sml
3.1
by James Canning - Oct. 30, 2009

This story would be much better if it raised the issue of whether the US should be taking such a large role in Afghanistan, when other countries are much better placed to sort out how best to bring stability to the country. Iran says Nato should have sent tractors rather than tanks to Afghanistan.

The obvious way forward in Afghanistan is to have Iran, Russia, India and other countries including China work together to generate trade, economic development, build roads, etc. etc. US needs to lower its profile substantially, not increase it as sought by General McChrystal.

(7 answers)

James's Rating

Overall
3.1

Average
from 7 answers
Quality
3.0
Information
3.0
Insight
3.0
Style
3.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »