Grading the Public Options That Already Exist

Pundits and politicians from both sides of the fence have been hollering themselves blue about a potential public health care option. Instead of relying on private insurers, the government would insure people itself. The idea is that if a Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via ProPublica
Tags Help
Subjects: Health, Business, Politics, U.S.
Topics: Health Care
Editorial Help
Posted by: via ProPublica - Oct 28, 2009 - 12:35 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Oct 29, 2009 - 10:17 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
N1812091_2834_thumb
4.1
by Derek Hawkins - Oct. 29, 2009

Excellent survey of existing "public options" and their costs versus benefits. While nothing in this story ties the programs discussed explicitly to the proposals in Congress, the comparisons are enlightening. Highly recommended.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
by Fabrice Florin - Oct. 29, 2009

Informative report on existing public options for health insurance in the United States, such as Tricare, Veterans Administration, Medicare and Medicaid. This short and impartial article provides useful facts on a half-dozen government insurance programs, detailing the good, the bad and the ugly for each of them. A helpful read that offers some perspective on the health care reform bill being debated in Congress.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Riehl_small_1__thumb
3.6
by Richard Riehl - Oct. 29, 2009

This is a very basic and clear description of various government health plans, which provides a good thumbnail sketch but also a very superficial look at the programs. Forcing the good, bad and ugly format on the report tends to oversimplify the issues. Important considerations missing from this concise overview are indicators of patient satisfaction and health intervention outcomes--both key ingredients to measure a program's success. And the headline is misleading--I was looking ... More »

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.0
by Priscilla L. Davis - Nov. 1, 2009

This is quality journalism because the piece provides well written, simply stated, factual data on various government -run heath care programs, that are already in existance. It also ranks them good,bad or ugly.

See Full Review » (3 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.6
by Jon Cooper - Oct. 29, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.7

Good
from 5 reviews (58% confidence)
Quality
3.7
Facts
4.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.0
Insight
3.0
Sourcing
3.8
Style
3.7
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.3
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
3.3
Expertise
2.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
3.7
Transparency
5.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
3.8
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • The Lethal Politics Of The Opt-Out Public Option

    (Blog Post) I'm surprised this hasn't gotten more attention. But imagine for a moment that the opt-out public option passes and becomes law (I give it a 65 percent chance at this point). ...
    2.7
  • Ezra Klein on the House health care reform bill

    (Blog Post) So what exactly did the House put out this morning? Is it the Robust opt-out Public Option that Sen. Reid talked about? Ezra Klein: No. So to do a bit on defining terms here: ...
    Posted by Derek Hawkins
    3.5