Exit, Pursued By History

How Bush treated Clinton and how Obama should handle Bush.

On the face of it, Obama might have less incentive to knock his predecessor off his presidential pedestal. Clinton ended his term with approval ratings in the sixties; even after Marc Rich outrage hardened into a season of Clinton fatigue, the public could compartmentalize tawdry behavior from competent presidential management. Bush, by contrast, is Mephistophelian in his unpopularity. Could some leaked post-inauguration allegation about his leaving the ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

See All Reviews »

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Review

Silhouette_sml
3.1
by Gary Clark - Jan. 16, 2009

This speculative Op-Ed piece proposes that Obama should exploit every opportunity to contrast himself to the poor performance of the Bush regime. It recaps Clinton's exit, with Neo-Con rumors of stolen silverware, sabotaged offices, etc. suggesting Demos follow suit; "they ought to let every embarrassing detail out." It also implies a danger of Bush's image improving as time erases painful images of war, hurricanes, and fiscal fallout. It's interesting in a mean-spirited way but not very convincing policy advice.

I doubt that people will forget soon, and with congressional appproval ratings lower than Bush and Cheney the new administration needs support for, and participation in, a new modus operandi, not more of the political chicanery that has passed for government in the last 4 decades.

(10 answers)

Gary's Rating

Overall
3.1

Average
from 10 answers
Quality
2.9
Fairness
2.0
Information
2.0
Style
3.0
Context
4.0
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
4.0
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
4.0
More How our ratings work »